Agreements: Apply a four column layout to the Agreement preview pane

Description

Apply a four column layout to the Agreement preview pane, including the fixed panel at the top of the pane. Reposition the fields as shown in the mockup.

Change the label "Agreement period note" to "Current period note".

"Status" is permanently displayed in the fixed panel at the top of the pane. Currently when "Status" = "Closed" it is displayed again on screen, lower down (as shown in the screen shot). It should not be displayed twice, only once, in the fixed panel.

Attachments

2
  • 08 Oct 2020, 12:48 PM
  • 08 Oct 2020, 12:30 PM

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Activity

Show:

Owen StephensSeptember 24, 2020 at 2:29 PM

thanks Gill - can you do updated mockups with 4 col layout but Description kept in current position and add to issue?

Gill OsguthorpeSeptember 24, 2020 at 2:18 PM

??Gill Osguthorpe I don't have an issue moving to a four column layout, but these designs also move the Description which I'm not so sure about (currently the Description is above the other fields and can occupy the whole width.) ??

I did wonder about this. You're right it would be best to get feedback from users before moving it.

??citation??Is it worth us moving to 4 col layout even without moving the Description?

I'd say yes. It has three benefits: consistency with other View panes, all the key-value pairs will take up two rows rather than the four they currently take up when Status="closed" making the display more compact, and shortening the line length of Description and Period note is good from a UX/readability perspective. This is how it looks at the moment:

Preview unavailable

Owen StephensSeptember 24, 2020 at 12:39 PM
Edited

I don't have an issue moving to a four column layout, but these designs also move the Description which I'm not so sure about (currently the Description is above the other fields and can occupy the whole width.) Is it worth us moving to 4 col layout even without moving the Description?

I'm not really against moving the description but I think I'd like to get some feedback from sites that have implemented on typical sizes of the field and whether compressing it and putting below the other fields is the right thing to do

Done

Details

Components

Assignee

Reporter

Priority

Sprint

Development Team

Bienenvolk

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs

Created September 22, 2020 at 4:21 PM
Updated March 21, 2022 at 3:44 PM
Resolved December 14, 2020 at 10:59 AM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs

Flag notifications