| | |
|---|
6:00 | Housekeeping | |
8:11 | Courses Demo | Tara does an extremely abbreviated demo of courses, including a tour of settings, creating a course, adding an instructor, and adding an item
|
14:30 | Start of Semester Workflow | |
17:30 | Courses PO | Tara reminds us that Courses does not currently have a product owner, which is necessary for any of the requested features to move forward. Erin notes that there is no Product Owner or Development Team. Index Data addresses bugs within capacity, but is not funded to do courses. There is no infrastructure to move things forward currently. Tara asks about how people are making the best out of what there currently is.
|
18:30 | Position of "add items" | |
19:12 | Deleting loan type is not automated | Michael Bednar seconds what Eileen says, and adds: when you delete the item from the course, it deletes the course reserves item, but each individual item has to be modified on the item page in inventory. Loan type is NOT removed. Erin reminds us that it should update location.
|
20:46 | Reserves Transit Notes | |
22:45 | Courses "Templates"? | Ian summarizes: there are a certain number of fields that need to be added to reserves--some combination of notes, location, loan type, typically. Additionally, there must be a remove process. This process is different for each library. Ian says that if there is a way to make this general enough (a template of some sort), this would be very useful to many libraries. Folks agree.
|
24:00 | View Only Courses Permissions | Holy Cross is experiencing difficulties with permissions for staff vs students. There is no way for students with "view only" permissions to see what course an item is on reserve for from the reserves page. It would be useful for students to be able to see reserves without having to edit. Erin notes that this sounds like a regression--Bob and Tara will follow up with Erin.
|
26:11 | Physical Labels/Reserves Volume | Suzy says that her institution does not use check in/check out notes. Their reserves are at circulation, and they use physical labels--it's one less pop up notes. They do have the same problem with loan type mentioned by other libraries. Course reserves requests are down significantly at their institution. (27:20) Tara asks as a side thought if use of electronic reserves has increased, and wonders how that's being handled. (27:40) Laszlo notes that reserves does decrease, but is still extremely high volume. The concern at Stanford is the amount of manual processing steps both putting things on and reserve and taking them off. Stanford's systems group created a function to de-reserve items elegantly via API. Lack of automation is a serious concern.
|
28:50 | Cool Tools for Reserves | |
30:00 | Personal Copies | |
36:00 | Discovery | |
39:30 | Electronic Reserves | "Are electronic reserves being handled in FOLIO, or in another system like Ares? If there are two systems, are they being presented to students as separate or merged interfaces?" One way is to include a link to a file stored somewhere else. Are there others? Eileen says that electronic reserves are totally separate--they are handled in Canvas. Laszlo says Stanford uses the fast add process. This is more book keeping--it would be ideal if there were better ways of linking a print resource to an e-resource. Suzy uses a fast add record and links to the inventory record.
|
42:00 | Statistics | Statistics--how are you doing statistics for course reserves? Bob at Holy Cross used LDP. LDP is not used by all libraries--Bywater has their own solution. They look at loans, as well as items that never circulated. Libraries like to give these reports to professors to demonstrate the efficacy of their loans. Ian notes one challenge which is that because it relies on what is currently in the system, it is not possible to do this after a clean out. (44:50) Kara uses Google CoLab to do circulation reporting. Erin notes that this is "badass data work." Kara adds that Panorama's courses functionality is very limited currently, but hopefully that will eventually be a solution. (Suzy agrees.) Erin says that the data is available in LDP. (47:30) Tara notes that all of these reporting functions focus on circulation. She asks if there is anything else anyone is recording statistics on. For example, what was on reserve for a certain year? How many items were on reserve and when were they submitted? (Someone) keeps these statistics manually--recording both circulation and what is requested. (49:20) ACRL stats may be problematic--there's yearly reporting, and pulling out reserves may be complicated.
|
50:00 | End of semester processes | Ian notes that some libraries do not like leaving past terms in FOLIO. In order to delete a term, all dependencies must be deleted, but Ian has found a lingering dependency around instructors that is not available in the UI. Erin says that once we have developers, it would maybe be possible to add an "inactive" status to handle this better. Duke has the same issue--they imported classes from 2016 onwards. (52:00) Suzy notes that they have seen this as well and must sometimes submit a ticket to get things removed. Suzy takes off the item record, the holding record, and then marks the instance for deleting, as well as marking it for suppression. (53:00) Someone in chat asks if removing terms is a best practice. Erin says: not necessarily, but it is a known gap. Historical information is valuable, but FOLIO does not have this ability yet. Laszlo notes that this is desired by Stanford as well. There is generally a desire to be able to reuse courses.
|
54:45 | Housekeeping | Tara asks what the most productive thing to do with all these ideas and thoughts actually is. Erin says to put them into slack--not everyone is comfortable searching Jira, and much has been captured already. Erin tried to capture a stub Jira as requests come up. A wiki page may also be valuable. Erin reiterates that anyone who is interested in the PO role should reach out to her.
|
1:00:00 | Inventory Integration | |