Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2024-12-05 Metadata Management Meeting notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Current »

Meeting time: 11:30 AM EDT, 05:30 PM CET, 04:30 PM BST

Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/527543204 . The meeting password can be found here.

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

✍️ Note taker

Laura Daniels, Lynne Fors, Alissa Hafele, Natascha Owens

📹 Recordings

Recordings of meetings can be found in the Metadata_Management_SIG > Recordings folder on AWS from 2022 onwards: https://recordings.openlibraryfoundation.org/folio/metadata-management-sig/

🗣️ Discussion items

Item

Presenter

Notes

Announcements


Bugfest extended 1 week - ends tomorrow and many unclaimed tests still.

Results from subject granularity and date sort/filter UAT

Christine Schultz-Richert

Ryan Taylor

Christine Schultz-Richert could you share your slides here?

19 participates and no showstopper issues!

Date sort

  • excited but confusion around functionality. Some UI changes needed to be functionality more clear.

  • suggested enhancements - resize, change delimiter, change to way info appears in descriptive data accordion.

  • Next step: UI/UX change discussion

Subject Granularity

  • well received

  • some reports of issue with display of subject source - mapping rules confusion around local config for 2nd ind. 7

  • suggest enhancements - change to display of $2 info when settings unavailable. No Jira yet but looking into getting work done.

PC updates

Charlotte Whitt

2024-12-05 Product Council Agenda & Meeting Notes

Announcements: LOC is now on FOLIO also on Acquisition and soon also to go live with ERM.

Update on subgroup’s eval of PC Functionality Review process: Jennifer Eustis's presentation. Currently the PC has a decision log, but we are not tracking the process. Currently lack in clarity and no well understood process on when and why to submit review to PC. The working group has therefor consulted the much more structured TC Request Review process. A similar process provide a structure. The PC working group will work further on the purpose with this. The working group has presented the proposal to the Product Owners, and gotten feed back. Caitlyn Stewart underscored that right now the burden is on POs to present for the PC. The PC is proposing to play an more active role and the PC to be more pro-active. The PC can help coordinate, and make sure the limited resources are spend well. Kristin Martin: What is important is that the PC Review process is mutual beneficial - for the PC, for the POs/Development team.

PC Goals ranking results and next steps: Caitlin Stewart's presentation.

Screenshot 2024-12-05 at 16.59.03.png

Screenshot 2024-12-05 at 16.59.35.png

BELA (Bulk Edit and Lists App)

Jennifer Eustis

No meeting. Focused on Bug Fest.

Data Import Working Group

Jennifer Eustis

No meeting. Focused on Bug Fest.

🧑‍💻 Chat

  • No labels