| Topic | Notes | Notes SLUB |
|---|---|---|
| Difference between investigation and search for non-full text databases | Jessica Harris will look into this before the meeting | |
| Questions about open access use | Should we have a separate open access use report or should we try to accomplish OA reporting goals with the existing reports? (We will have the acces_type field available as part of the master report.) Even if we do want a separate OA report, how should we handle it for the Agreement-based reports? Should we include OA or not? | separate open access use reports, because we only want to determine the costs per download for closed content (contend that we actually pay for) |
| Visualizations for reports | Review report mockups and think about what type of data visualization preview you'd like to see in FOLIO. Can include pie chart, line graph, bar graph, etc. Ideas can include descriptions, sketches, examples from other systems, etc. |
|
| Report view download in eUsage | We are currently working on integrating CSV download for Counter R5 report views. We most likely won’t be able to offer every report view as direct CSV download (but they can be created from the master reports). Which report views are the most commonly used views that we should support? Feedback University Library Leipzig: * DR_D1 = Database Search and Item Usage * TR_B1 = Book Requests (Excluding OA_Gold) * TR_J1 = Journal Requests (Excluding OA_Gold) * TR_J4 = Journal Request by Year of Publication (Excluding OA_Gold) Feedback University of Chicago: * DR_D1 = Database Search and Item Usage * TR_B3 = Book Usage by Access Type * TR_J3 = Journal Usage by Access Type * TR_J4 = Journal Request by Year of Publication (Excluding OA_Gold) | Also relevant for SLUB Dresden |
General
Content
Integrations