Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2022-03-09 Meeting notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Current »

Date

Attendees


Zoom link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83765784781?pwd=c1RTSVNOQ1huNk1sVFVGRExIVFROQT09 

Discussion items

ItemNotes

To Dos

follow ups 

  • Anya will ask Anton if there is a possiblity for getting a SIG rank field
Testing

Notes:

Discuss proposal


  • agreements
    • keep JIRA for rankings: information in one place, everyone well trained → possible: different layout to have rankings not as prominent?
    • strengthen SIGs
      • have a SIG vote in JIRA (in addition to PO vote)
      • discussion and feature presentation in SIG meetings; through PO; can outline dependencies and has overview over capacity for own dev team→ asynchronous voting in separate tool (options see above); given and clearly communicated time period to vote
      • ranking within functional area through functional experts
      • questions to PC: is adding an extra tool an option? → needs payment, training, maintenace
    • devote specific percentage of dev time for technical/platform features (NFRs) → how much? → involve TC
  • open
    • member ranking vs. single institution ranking
      • present different options to PC/CC → decision there
  • Draft proposal

Notes:

  • Add to agreements:
    • rather vote/rank the Epics  than the features
      • would require more work for the POs to bring the Epics in better shape
    • How would the ranking process work for new Members?
      • Jira could be to much/to complicated for the newer Members
    • Jira is more a tool for the background info on the features but can be used in addition to a voting tool
    • Some Institutions would like to keep the Jira rankings for institutional uses like Dashboards, to keep track of the features
    • Have a different tool to prioritize the features to have it on a higher level, which is easier for newer members
    • Michelle in Chat: 

      there might also be individual issues in an epic that emerge as high priority, apart from the rest of the epic

    • Thomas suggests https://airtable.com/ for ranking (advantages: CSV import possible, visualization)
    • Summarize: No Ranking in Jira by institutions but have a prioritisation in another tool (give the institutions the chance to say what is important to them)
    • Option: voting in another tool than Jira and than adding the ranking to the features/epics
    • Have a subgroup looking at how Jira is used right now 
    • Are SIGs up for the task of ranking - how would that look like - Have the POs and Conveners bring new features to discuss and rank them
    • What is with the features that are not picked up by SIGs or do not have a PO?
    • How will this new tool be maintained? - Link to Jira features
Next steps
  • finalize the proposal
  • Bring the proposal to the PC / CC/ PO reps to talk about how to go forward

Chat


Action items

  •  
  • No labels