Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2019-04-09 Kickoff Meeting

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Current »


TimeTopicLead ByNotesAction Items
:00HousekeepingKaren
  • Brief introductions.
  • If you miss a meeting, the recordings are available here.
  • Our liaison to the Sys Ops & Mgt SIG and Data Migration Sub-group is Tod.

Orientation/On-Boarding:


:10About the GroupKaren

Key concepts:

  • This is an open group–anyone can join.
  • We should allow any sub-groups to be formed–no judgement.
  • Important that we not duplicate efforts of other groups.

What is the purpose of the group?

  • In general the consensus was the the group should have a higher-level, coordination role
  • It's an opportunity to step back from any one domain and look at things broadly
  • There's also a desire to build community and identify people who can be resources for implementation
  • This group can help facilitate that by providing a venue to ask questions and identifying the right people to answer them
  • People should be encouraged to share questions and challenges from the gap analysis and their own implementation activities

:20FOLIO Working MeetingKaren

Should we plan a meeting Wednesday morning for face to face/Zoom? June 19

  • Yes, we will have the majority of group members in attendance, so we will plan to meet.

Some possible goals/topics for the meeting include:

  • A round robin of updates from each implementer
  • Sharing experiences with installation, testing, mapping, etc.
  • Sharing experiences related to data clean up
  • Brainstorming ideas for areas that the group can help support
  • Identifying tools, documentation, or procedures we can develop
  • Identifying tools that can be reused across institutions
  • Following up on the feature prioritization/gap analysis
  • Setting up a pipeline from the SIGs to the Implementation Group

:40What should we tackle first?Karen

How is the Feature Prioritization/Gap Analysis for 2019 work being done at your library?

  • Most people have one or more groups meeting regularly to discuss issues
  • Alabama, Chalmers, and 5 Colleges met in person with EBSCO to talk through the features and are pretty close to done
  • FLO had a kick-off meeting with Index Data to review requirements and are now working through the spreadsheet
  • Duke has hired three analysts who are currently working on a review

There was a desire for this group to be involved in reviewing the results of the gap analysis and to put together a holistic view of our priorities as a community.

Anya shared that 5 Colleges is entering their feature rankings directly into JIRA and have a dashboard to monitor new features coming in: https://issues.folio.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10505


 

  • No labels