Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Meeting notes

...

Attendees 


Discussion items

FOLIO topics from the China community
TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll
Marc Johnson Maccabee Levine followed by Ingolf KussCraig McNally

Reminder:  Please copy/paste the Zoom chat into the notes.  If you miss it, this is saved along with the meeting recording, but having it here has benefits.

5-10 minLiaison Updates
  • CC: Maccabee Levine 
    • No update this week.
  • PC: Tod Olson
    • Discussion of the topics from China document and next steps
      • PC organizing smaller group to discuss with volunteers from the China community to better understand the issues.
      • Looking also for non-PC volunteers
    • Discussion of the State of FOLIO doc posted by CC
      • Many questions about intended audience, use(s) and reuse of the document
      • CC framing was about aligning the community
    • For both topics, see 2024-05-2 Product Council Meeting Notes for more detail
    • Should TC have a member reporting back from the "topics from China" group any Tri-Council groups, in general?
      • Consensus yes.  No other groups currently not represented.
  • RMS Group: Jakub Skoczen
    • Some Poppy issues coming up.  Quesnelia release details to be announced soon.
    • Jakub Skoczen Not sure what else we can do about TC's request about item on timeline.  Can ask Alexsii to put on the agenda again.
      • Jeremy Huff Should TC itself just edit that document, by lazy consensus?
      • Maccabee Levine Given what we are attempting is better communication, I prefer affirmative agreement.  Prefer to ask Jakub Skoczen to be the squeaky wheel to get it on the agenda.
      • Jakub Skoczen will try one more time to get it on the agenda.
  • Security Team: Craig McNally
    • No update, business as usual.
  • Tri-council Application Formalization: Jenn Colt
    • May cancel this week to allow people to attend TC Q&A on the same day.
    • Craig McNally Will need written answers to what he and VBar answered at the previous Q&A meeting.  Jenn Colt will do so.
5 minUpcoming MeetingsAll
  •  - Regular TC meeting
  •  - Dedicated Discussion - Architectural PoC Q&A continued
  •  - Dedicated Discussion Regular TC meeting
  •  - Dedicated Discussion -  Communicating Breaking ChangesTopic TBA.  Several TC members will be at Code4Lib (Maccabee Levine Jenn Colt Tod Olson)
  •  - Dedicated Discussion Regular TC meeting
  •  - Dedicated Discussion - Topic TBA- Communicating Breaking Changes
  • 27 May 2024 - Regular TC 
  • 29 May 2024 - Alternate time meeting for China and Australia topics?
4 minTCR Board ReviewAll
10-15 min

Technical Council Sub-Groups Updates

All

  • TCR Update
    • Discussed earlier re: RMSG update.
  • Jeremy: a subgroup to be formed regarding static code analysis
  • Propose a Developer Documentation Subgroup. This group could include/work with the developer advocate.
5 minRFCs

All

  • Go Language
    • Jakub Skoczen needs to close Public Review phase.  Discuss next meeting about Final Review.
  • Application Formalization
    • Craig McNally Similar situation, comments to be resolved, but it has all the feedback it will get.  Address those comments and then move to Final Review.
  • Centralized vs Distributed configuration - Final Review we should choose a time for discussion
5 minAction ItemsJenn ColtTod OlsonJeremy Huff
  • Jenn Colt: Decision Log issues update - fixed, required re-publishing the pages
  • Tod OlsonFOLIO topics from the China community update from the PC
    • Main question is getting adequate TC representation on this group.
    • Jeremy Huff Wait and see what happens with PC's group, if they need technical perspective help, then put on our agenda in the future?
    • Tod Olson agrees.  Doesn't necessarily have to be TC members; just folks from the technical side of FOLIO.
  • Jeremy Huff:
    • WOLFCon Submission (Complete)
    • Advertise Communicating Breaking Changes PoC Demo update
1 minDecision LogAll


5 - 10 minAll

Tod Olson: Any update since last weeks discussion

5 - 10 minGlobally Friendly MeetingAll

Should we propose a meeting schedule that includes some times that will work for people in all time zones?

  • Jenn Colt Try one meeting like that before committing to a regular schedule.
  • Tod Olson Do we know what timezones to target?
  • Jeremy Huff China and Australia likely candidates who we'd like to see participating.  So if they are available at the timeslot PC selected, go with that?  Or try something different to compare?
  • Tod Olson Since we're looking at Topics from China doc, do a similar time to be attractive to that audience.
  • Jeremy Huff Move a dedicated discussion to that timeslot?
    • Jenn Colt Application Formalization was the topic for that one, and was pressure.  Better to solicit the topic(s) from that group.  China we have topics; try to solicit topics from NLA as well.
  • Jeremy Huff Target 5/29 as target date for alternate timeslot.  Jeremy will reach out to both groups, solicit topics. 
    • Does 8pm ET work for people?  Generally yes for US people, no for Europe people.
    • Give it a go, see how it went.
  • Maccabee Levine A future timeslot could be friendly for Europe and China/Australia but not North America.
10-15Topic Backlog GroomingAll

After reaching out to the developer channel there were several topics suggested to the TC to investigate. We should review these topics and decide how/if they should be added to our topic backlog

  • API Linting, suggested by Pavlo Smahin on 4/17
    • Jeremy Huff Should TC dive into this one?
    • Jeremy Huff will take Pavlo's text and add to topic backlog.  Can refine in the future.
  • PR Templates, suggested by Azizbek Khushvakov on 4/18
    • 24 replies in the Slack thread.
    • Craig McNally We've had this discussion many times in the past without getting anywhere.  May be captured in notes from years back, but consensus then was that it was really up to individual teams to decide what they want to do.
    • Jeremy Huff Similar recollection.  Do like the idea of high-level guidance, or documenting best practices.  But not perscriptive.
    • Jeremy Huff will add to the topic backlog.  Even if our decision is to make more explicit i.e. decision record, should be friendly to folks who suggest we talk about something.  There might be half-measures to take in that direction.
  • Java 21, suggested by Azizbek Khushvakov
    • Craig McNally we will need to upgrade Java at some point, whether 21 or future version.  Can't live on 17 forever.
    • Jeremy Huff will add to future topics, or in context of OST
  • Kafka module mod-kafka, suggested by Mike Taylor on 4/30
    • Jeremy Huff This reads like an RFC.  Well-formed idea, the suggestion from TC may be to create an RFC.
    • Jeremy Huff will add this to the future topics backlog also.
Time Permitting

Officially Supported Technologies (OST)

All

Standing agenda item to review/discuss any requested or required changes to officially supported technology lists


NAZoom Chat

...