Issues

Select view

Select search mode

 
50 of 57

add endpoint for service points

Done

Description

and UIORG-51 and depend on this.

Also, it might be necessary to scope permissions to locations or to service points (not for the stories above but further down the road).

Environment

None

Potential Workaround

None

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Priority

Development Team

Other dev

Fix versions

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs
Created March 12, 2018 at 2:09 PM
Updated November 3, 2023 at 2:55 PM
Resolved April 25, 2018 at 12:56 PM

Activity

Show:

Marc JohnsonApril 26, 2018 at 10:08 AM
Edited

Have raised and to reflect the work for removing the fee fine owner from service points.

There might need to be another issue for moving the interface dependency in the UI to the new version (or it could be that UIORg-74 is a two-step operation)

Marc JohnsonApril 24, 2018 at 12:36 PM
Edited

The pull request to remove the `feeFineOwner` property should not be merged until the UI has removed it's usage of it. So I have blocked this issue.

I'm talking to in order to determine what is involved in this work and whether we need a new issue (as is in review).

Cate BoeremaApril 13, 2018 at 2:56 PM

Hi . We have decided that the fee/fine owner flag doesn't belong on the service point. Should I file a separate issue to have that removed or can I just remove it from (scenario 5).

Sorry for the change!

Kurt NordstromMarch 22, 2018 at 4:15 PM

Is there going to be a service point id as a foreign key in one of the other records?

Jakub SkoczenMarch 22, 2018 at 3:52 PM

we need to decide if this goes into mod-circ-storage or mod-inv-storage. can we check if any kind of search or filtering by service points will be needed (especially in the inventory?)

TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs