Have raised and to reflect the work for removing the fee fine owner from service points.
There might need to be another issue for moving the interface dependency in the UI to the new version (or it could be that UIORg-74 is a two-step operation)
Marc Johnson April 24, 2018 at 12:36 PM
Edited
The pull request to remove the `feeFineOwner` property should not be merged until the UI has removed it's usage of it. So I have blocked this issue.
I'm talking to in order to determine what is involved in this work and whether we need a new issue (as is in review).
Cate Boerema April 13, 2018 at 2:56 PM
Hi . We have decided that the fee/fine owner flag doesn't belong on the service point. Should I file a separate issue to have that removed or can I just remove it from (scenario 5).
Sorry for the change!
Kurt Nordstrom March 22, 2018 at 4:15 PM
Is there going to be a service point id as a foreign key in one of the other records?
Jakub Skoczen March 22, 2018 at 3:52 PM
we need to decide if this goes into mod-circ-storage or mod-inv-storage. can we check if any kind of search or filtering by service points will be needed (especially in the inventory?)
and UIORG-51 and depend on this.
Also, it might be necessary to scope permissions to locations or to service points (not for the stories above but further down the road).