Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2024-11-07 Product Council Agenda and Meeting Notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Current »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

https://zoom.us/j/867230970

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

5 min

Announcements

all

  • Linked Open Data subgroup is now a SIG

  • Yogesh Kumar sees new Bugfest testers but number of claimed test cases is still low; more people need to engage to reach our goal to finish Bugfest till end of month.

    • Jeremy is about to send out a notice on behalf of PC, awaits approval. Where should it be posted: email and/or through SIGs? => Should be sent by email.

  • Jana Freytag: RA SIG seeks new co-convenor; should be announced on general folio slack channel

50 min

Prioritization rollout in the SIGs

Kristin Martin Martina Schildt

Review of Prioritization process in Acquisition SIG:

Acquisitions/Resource Management implementers

Prioritization

Desired outcome: Jira dashboard of features identified as SIG priorities that may not be slated for a release, but can be picked up by development teams.

Questions for discussion:

  • Do you already have a mechanism for your SIG for collecting priorities?

  • Are priorities represented in Jira or through another means?

  • Do you keep a topic backlog/topic page that you can draw on to develop priorities?

  • Are there dormant features that should be revisited?

  • What barriers do you have in collecting priorities?

  • What do you think would be a good time frame for collecting priorities?

  • What can the PC do to help your SIG with this work?

Martina Schildt opens topic by quickly presenting how ACQ SIG is doing prioritisation:

  • Wiki page (see above) for implementer topics; topics will be discussed in SIG and wiki page is amended

  • From topcis Jira tickets are created; each ticket can be voted with the like button (upper right)

  • High votes do not garantee rapid development, but developers can orient on that if they have spare dev time

  • Jira dashboard with most voted tickets

Discussion of Questions above: (not final, Martin needs to consult recordings)

  • Jana: RA SIG has backlog list, no voting process, but prioritzing gaps, work through it in meetings Gap list RA SIG

    • Existing Jira tickets are searched and linked

    • person responsible for a gap should create tickets

    • are tags used for tickets? => currently not

    • There is need for volunteers for creating/maintaining the tickets

  • Martina: ERM has similar system as ACQ SIG; ERM SIG is willing to adopt process

  • Laura: LD SIG has small parking lot, currently planning meetings is more of a topic and curently there are also no implementers; the prioritisation process will be discussed, important
    MM SIG is more difficult, difficult to come to an agreement on priorities as institutions have very differnt needs

    • Alexis: there need no necessary be agreement; priorities should surface needs

  • Kristin: AI SIG looked at have spreadsheet

    • more info from spreadsheet should go into Jira

    • Dashboards can help people get active if they’re concerned with something in folio

  • Martina: cleaning up the tickets is important

  • Laura: things that have been thinthreaded/half implemented should be revisited, what approaches are there?

    • Kristin: timing would be good now for that; but thinthreaded things may not be visible in Jira as they may be marked as done; some kind of survey would have to be done

    • Jana: going though backlogs and closing deprecated features may remove load

    • Caitlin: Jira tickets can be bulk updated, eg. add labels; special permissions are needed; Holly used to do it; Permissions may need to be adjusted. Peter can look into it

  • => there should be a recorded session about creating and maintaining tickets

  • Sharon: Reporting SIG use github issues, easier and faster to organise for their needs; with Reporting app SIG returns to Jira. Meta DB is managed through github issues.

    • Charlotte: mod-reporting, ui-ldp and mod-ldp all were managed with JIRA

  • Charlotte: It would be useful if all members had permissions to use tags to label tickets; ?

  • Kristin: Prioritisation rollout till Trillium; but usable beginning next year; standardized tagset for better search

  • Martina: How can the PC help convenors discuss / roll out this process in SIGs

  • Sharon: maybe there should be a Jira support group; Caitlin in chat: maybe a slack channel

    • nobody should not to get their things done because they don’t know Jira

  • Charlotte: When talking to devs: If it isn’t in Jira, it doesn’t exist

  • Tod: this topic parallels with lifecycle of definition of done in different teams

5 min

Future topics

all

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels