Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2021-04-22 Metadata Management Meeting notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 27 Next »

Date

please put an 'x' next to your name in the list below the "Discussion items" if you are attending. Thanks!

Recordings

Recordings of meetings can be found in the Metadata_Management_SIG > Recordings folder on Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B7G8S7WF6N20YUM4My1oRTIxSHM

Discussion items

PC updateLaura E Daniels

Minutes

Highlights:

Iris release on time (despite Data Import instabilities)

    • Because of Data Import issues, there will probably be an enhancement/hotfix post-Iris

Shanghai Library live with check-out in 1 branch (they have 400 branches)

Discussion of role of PC as it relates to various other groups, including SIGs, following formation of Community Council

    • Liaison model will continue, at least for "core" SIGs (such as MM)

WolfCon planning

Notes:

  • highlights: above
  • MM SIG will continue to report to Product council
  • What will Wolfcon be this year 2021 (all OLF projects, not just FOLIO)
  • no MM SIG meeting the week of Wolfcon
    • maybe a working meeting week before or after on focused decision making
    • we can schedule practical working meetings for the future (suggestion my AM)
    • 8 deep dive sessions at WolfCON across all the projects, FOLIO will get three of them
    • This meeting will take a higher level approach, so specific and practical meetings will be fewer at this meeting
    • Propose taking a serious look at ElasticSEARCH (Laura will reach out to Jesse K about that)
Other updates, announcements

Cancel May 6 meeting? (conflict with PCC OpCo) - cancelled

User permissions management document (from App Interaction) 

More routine (monthly?) scheduled PO updates for MM?

Notes:

  • We do get updates, but are hoping for something more routine for these
  • How might we get SMEs and POs into getting scheduled updates (just at least to officially touch base)
    • even if nothing is new
    • deemed a good idea (CW)
    • there may be some update issues from information sharing about which version of the platform (due to release differences) [honeysuckle, iris, juniper, etc]
    • even if repetitive, good to keep the ideas continually shared in the pipeline publicly shared
    • from chat, AM (Sounds fine to me. And I think it's good to have end of dev cycle/beginning of dev cycle updates, e,g, what is available in Iris and what is planned for Juniper )


Single MARC record import (from OCLC)

Updates/Demo

Notes:

  • ON the flip side, one might need to push from OCLC to FOLIO (using OCLC export gateway, or whatever), instead of pulling the whole record from FOLIO)
  • Created Edge connection, that listens to OCLC to see if anything is new or updated, that needs to get into FOLIO
  • OCLC Worldcat as a Z39.50 target, but this allowed the creation of multiple Z39.50 targets
  • from chat, AM (edge-connexion is similar to edge-orders, which listens for new orders that may be transmitted from a vendor to FOLIO )
  • single permission controls single FOLIO pull
  • from chat (I want to be able to edit those profiles. )
  • data import is the support for this work, not the owner
  • updates if there is SRS, or creates SRS if not, and updates Instance
  • This will come out of the box with one profile
  • from chat, CW (You can duplicate the profile. That will then be editable, Lloyd )
  • In data-import, one can build as many profiles as an institution may wnt
  • this is about controlling scope
  • the UI needed to be able to support the import
  • Anything else wanted was deemed too large at this point, due to scoping
  • from chat (Editing the default profile is more important to me that selecting different ones. ) - also important to UChicago
  • from chat (We really need PUSH to overlay, so I had hoped that if we could edit the profile, or create a new profile just for OCLC PUSH would allow us to have matching logic where if there was a match it would overlay and if no match it would create a new record. ) - also important to UChicago
  • push just got added in the last few weeks or so
  • CT: asking about the future of this development and local needs
  • FROM CHAT (Agreed—we are having trouble conveying the importance of this functionality because there is nothing we can rank or now repoint )
  • from chat (But we need this functionality! )
  • ref UXPROD2912  UXPROD-2912 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  • from chat (Exactly CHristie, lacking that functionality you really need PUSH to overlay. )
  • demo of overlay functionality when needing to bring in a new record, but the overlay did not work
  • from chat (Is this a disconnect between inventory and SRS? )
  • What about a bug fix for this issue, having troubles replicating
  • from chat (If it is a bug, I think this is "hotfix-worthy" - just need to figure out which dev team needs to work on it. Sounds like Mike has it covered )
  • from chat (Would the Overlay work if you had a record with Instance status FOLIO and then you overlay with the OCLC record?  / / That use case we have tested and verified in FOLIO Bugfest environment )
  • from chat. AM (Yes - there's 2 branches to the overlay. If Instance source = FOLIO, the overlay will create an SRS, change the instance source to MARC, and create an SRS record (not exactly in that order) )
  • from chat. AM (If Instance source = MARC, the overlay will update the SRS MARC, and update the Instance, with no change to the Source field )
  • export demo from OCLC connexion
  • Question about unicode in export, because of messy language displays
  • Link to Mike G's slides, here.
  • from chat (RE: Christie, yes, no issue with Chinese characters using the PULL method )


ElasticsearchMagda Zacharska

Related JIRA: UXPROD-3046 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Notes:

  • elasticSearch works in parallel with current search funcationality
  • from chat (What does "on the back end" mean for searching?  / /  I believe it means the functionality exists but there is no UI for it (someone correct me if I'm wrong) )
  • there were 8 participants in testing
  • searches in latin characters worked, but special characters caused an issue
  • added 'exact match'
  • from chat (New feature: UXPROD-3046
    Inventory. Swap from search tool PostgreSQL to Elasticsearch )
  • link to UXPROD3046 mentioned by Charlotte : 

    https://issues.folio.org/browse/UXPROD-3046

  • demo of UI and then from the backend
  • can handle up to 5 language analyzers 
  • from chat (Would it be relevant with a workshop (hands on session) testing/trying search of the back end functionality using Postman )
  • next steps?
  • from chat (I would expect "water in Africa" to search for that phrase, including the word "in")

present?

Name

Organization


Aaron TrehubAuburn

Ann-Marie BreauxEBSCO

Ann KardosUMass Amherst

x

Charlotte WhittIndex Data

Christie ThomasChicago
     Christin Seegerthbz

Colin Van AlstineSmith (FC)

Damian Biagi

Dennis BridgesStacks

Dennis ChristmanDuke University
     Douglas ChorpitaGoethe Uni Frankfurt

Dracine HodgesDuke University

Felix Hemme

ZBW

Filip Jakobsen

Jacquie SamplesDuke University

Jason KovariCornell

Jenn ColtCornell

Jennifer EustisUMass Amherst

Jessica JaneckiDuke University

Joshua BartonMichigan State

Kristen WilsonIndex Data
xLaura DanielsCornell

Lisa FurubottenTexas A&M

Lisa McCollLehigh University

Lisa SjögrenChalmers

Lynn Whittenberger
xMagda ZacharskaEBSCO

Martina Schildt

VZG


Molly DriscollEBSCO
xNancy Lorimer

Stanford


Natascha OwensChicago

Niels Erik Nielsen

Patty WanningerEBSCO
xPhilip Schreur
xRita Albrechthebis-Verbundzentrale

Sara ColglazierMHC/5C

Tiziana Possemato

Theodor Tolstoy

EBSCO

x

Wayne Schneider

Index Data


    Jesse LambertsonUniversity of Chicago

Raegan Wiechert

Missouri States University


Patricia RatkovichUniversity of Alabama

Khalilah GambrellEBSCO


  • No labels