2020-08-11 Meeting notes

Duke still has a lot of print serials, they want to have patterns built in, not really interested in automated claiming.  They don't have enough staff to enter manually.  They still have about 4,000 titles coming in.  Many are international and from places that aren't switching to online.

GBV would also like predictive checkin, and automated claiming

Cornell - predictive checkin would be nice

Texas A&M - maybe just need a timer/alert for claiming purposes

Patty - Lucy Liu was asking about this on the RM channel - maybe someone could get with her to get some requirements written

UXPROD-194 - not currently being worked on

UXPROD-1845 - claiming, not clear how this will work without patterns

Also need check-in for standing orders, not just serials

How do the rankings work for libraries that have already implemented?  Chalmers, for example, said they could wait a year for predictive checkin, it's now been almost a year and it's not coming.  The Capacity Planning Team has not gone back in to re-rank those features, and those institutions have also not gone back and re-ranked.  Seems the rankings are getting skewed.  Go-live gets highest priority, but implemented libraries can't use that because they're already live.

Should the PC talk about this?

Jesse -What about assistive patterns? When checking in, it lets you see what was checked in last.

Tod - don't have predictive checkin with OLE, but can see that there's a gap.  Natascha commented that she actually likes the flexibility of the captions and not being tied to strict patterns.

Duke plans to migrate their caption patterns, maybe everyone can get together and share.  Dennis said most of the discussions have been about user-created patterns.  Duke really wants to keep the patterns they already have and migrate them, not to recreate them all again in FOLIO.  Patty suggested saving them until FOLIO can accept them.

Could we get a demo from Chicago in a future meeting?

Demo by Chicago of their serials checkin.