Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 7
Next »
\uD83D\uDC65 Participants
Regrets:
\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|
| Member meetings | Alexis Manheim | Some people mentioned that they did not know about the member meeting, because emails (to folio-members list) went to the wrong people. How would we more reliably communicate with interested people at member institutions? Should discuss on the officers call with Kemner-Heek, Kirstin who maintains this list – the list might not change but we might need to coordinate with any other Could create a new slack channel Could ask for additional institutional contact or 2 for folks interested in membership ideas (which might then mean a separate list) Should there be engagement from the councils other than CC? If only reason to get involvement is membership then mainly CC, but should have other council members involved at least Was discussion on the officers' call but not conclusive
Discussion: The current folio-members list is really billing/institutional contacts Who do we want at a members meeting? There is a distinction between folks who make decisions about becoming or staying a members and those who are interested in governance An option would be to not target are particular group with an invitation but instead write a good description of the intended topics and share broadly – try to be frank about who we want to come Might still want to reach out to representatives of institutions that are not currently members
AGREEMENT that we will try to be more specific about the purpose of the meeting next time: to attract new members and increase engagement of existing members. Then advertise broadly
|
| Tri-council meeting Monday 2024-01-13 10am ET | | We should plan the upcoming tri-council meeting… focus on Eureka: Present information about transition to Eureka Ack. changes such as reduced maintenance and testing load (multiple environments) Ack. changes in support Getting this big architectural change through will necessitate circumventing some usual TC processes Cost implications of timeline for support of both Eureka and Okapi
Ask the three councils to take back to their next meetings and endorse the release schedule for the move (expect concrete proposal to come from TC) ACTION - Jenn Colt and Craig McNally will continue work with TC on plan/timeline and sketch meeting agenda ready for our 2025-01-06 meeting
|
| Community Update Forum 2024-10-24 and next one | | Reflections on 2024-10-24 Community Update
Feeling that attendance is not great but we don’t know how many people look at slides or view recording Recording up on YouTube https://youtu.be/l3nnd5zfT0s?feature=shared and 78 views so far We think the updates are a bit boring, could combine or alternate with some topical discussion Who/what are these meetings for?
Schedule and plan for next Community Update |
| Governance Model Review | | Discussed in CC https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/x/AoCkHQ and have created a google docs copy for discussion
. In last CC meeting it was decided that we’d do a tidy but not a major overhaul |
| In-person CC + chairs meeting | | Discussed in CC https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/x/A4CfIg – thinking Feb/Mar/early-Apr in DC – Simeon/Christopher/Caitlin working on possible dates |