Discussion about e2e tests and whether the criteria for Karate tests is clear, it isn't. Based on the existing understanding of the criteria Zak will go ahead and approve the evaluation.
TCR-9 No movement. Some information conversation about to get it moving forward but no specifics.
New module tech eval: Jeremy and Craig did not meet last week (New Module Tech eval)
Technical Eval process subgroup: no updates
TC Goals and objectives (Tod): continue to solicit feedback from developers and devops, plan is to streamline the document and prioritise the pain points.
Translations: no updates
FOLIO Scope criteria: the group has shrunk the scope and the plan is to have something ready within the next couple of weeks
Marc Johnson we should get a second RFC to address the remaining issues, we didn't do scope questions
Zak Burke no other standard for string i18n besides ICU seems to be out there, let's not waste time on researching this
Marc Johnson I thought we agreed that the first RFC will be internal to the TC to get an understanding of the process
Craig McNally too late, there are comments from non-TC members to effectively this a public RFC at this point
Jeremy Huff might be a good idea to identify specific people as reviewers when the RFC is created
Radhakrishnan Gopalakrishnanthe group behind the RFC should understand who should be asked for feedback, it doesn't matter if it's internal/external as only folks interested in the discussion will comment on the PR
Marc Johnson concern that there's little awareness, folks interested in leaving feedback may not be aware of the RFC. How can we help people become aware of this process?
Simeon Warner and Harry Kaplanian are running this year’s elections for all councils. Please let them know if anyone from PC or TC wants to help out. Also, they ask that you let them know whether you want to change description/qualifications from last year as well as confirm how many seats will be open (should be 5 for each council but not sure whether anyone has/is stepping down).Reminder that 6 seats on the TC/PC were supposed to be 2 year terms, and 5 seats were supposed to be 1 year terms - those 5 seats are the ones open for election this year. The announcement/request for candidates should go out May 9th. Our timetable is:
Call for Nominees May 9, 2022
Nominees due/finalized May 20, 2022
Voting opens May 30, 2022
Voting ends June 17, 2022
Results announce June 20, 2022
New Councils formed/start July 1, 2022
Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!
Today:
Reminder for those planning to run... Nominations are due by May 20 usingthis nomination form.
5-10 min
Community Update
All
Tentative date: May 27
TC needs to start preparing their update: Accomplishments in Q1 2022, Goals/plan for Q2 2022
Proposal (Marc Johnson) : keep it out of the technical decision process. The RFCs are to facilitate the act of making a decisions, ADRs are for recording the decisions; ADR may or may not require the RFC process, but if an RFC is needed they should be linked.