Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2023-11-02 Metadata Management Meeting notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Date

~

Note taker: Laura Daniels, Lynne Fors (11/02/23), Alissa Hafele, Natascha Owens

Recordings of meetings can be found in the Metadata_Management_SIG > Recordings folder on AWS from 2022 onwards: https://recordings.openlibraryfoundation.org/folio/metadata-management-sig/

Discussion items

Announcements

BugFest in progress! Difficulties in the bugFest environment, it's has been unstable. May extend BugFest testing due to these difficulties. More details are forthcoming

Lists App and Bulk Edit working group are combining into one group. Slack channel will be renamed. Alternating meeting topics between Bulk Edit and Lists App. Meetings are Tuesdays at 11:00am EST

UAT for Lists App is open:  for anyone who still would like to provide feedback on the Lists app for the Poppy release: this form https://forms.gle/39Rv4kXMeRcGxSP26 will be open through Friday, November 3rd.

Demo of creation of Bound withsCharlotte Whitt 

Slide deck: MM-SIG Bound-with UXPROD-3640 and UXPROD-3655 - simple edit solution








PC update

2023-11-2 Product Council Agenda and Meeting Notes

Announcements:

  1. The Re-architectural tri-council working-group will kick start their work next week. Jenn Colt is the convener.
  2. Bulk edit and the List app working groups will be merged, and will work more closely together going forward
  3. Bugfest - still test cases needs to be claimed
  4. FOLIO Days in Sweden 25-26 October - 2 days event, 60 participants from more than 15 institutions. Decided to form a Swedish FOLIO Community

 UAT test (continued talk):

Jennifer explained how UAT is being planed and conducted for Bulk Edit. Here the test is done in a local sandbox environment during a meeting. This is a good way to generate a good discussion while doing the test. Other UAT e.g. for Data Import new work. Overall a positive experience. Kristin Martin has also participated in UAT on some Order functionality. A group at uChicago worked through a very detailed list of questions in a Google form. This was a time consuming effort. Good to do the work with colleagues at uChicago, and the result/outcome was shared with the Acquisition SIG. Martina Schildt agreed that the Google forms are very detailed. Tested FYRO. Took time, but worth the effort. A test like this should be scheduled at least for 2 weeks. 

PC would like to ensure that UAT are not just for people who attend given SIG very regularly, but a broader group can attend. A new slack channel # UAT was discussed  but no decided. The purpose would be to broaden the word out. There is a wiki page on planning UAT. 

Jenifer did notice that planning and executing UAT takes a lot of time for the POs. There is also a little tendency of fatigue on attending all the misc. tests: UAT, Bugfest, and then typical local test at the institution when doing upgrades. 


Chat

  • No labels