Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2023-03-08 Data Import Subgroup meeting

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Current »

Recordings are posted Here (2022+) and Here (pre-2022)                   Slack channel for Q&A, discussion between meetings

Requirements details Here                                                                    Additional discussion topics in Subgroup parking lot


Attendees: Ann-Marie Breaux (Deactivated) Jennifer Eustis  Monica Arnold Lynne Fors Kayla Valdivieso Christie Thomas Jenn Colt Raegan Wiechert Taylor Smith Kim Wiljanen 

Current development (Orchid)

Agenda: 

    • Bugfest
      • Some folks are just starting to test
      • Some log messages are still odd (and will not be fixed until Poppy)
      • A-M ask Kitfox to run the cleanup script from MODSOURCE-585 - Getting issue details... STATUS on Orchid Bugfest a couple times, to see if we clean out any orphan SRS records (which may be messing with matches)
    • Orders UAT
      • Took care of some questions and issues raised in the Slack channel, e.g. https://folio-project.slack.com/archives/CA39M62BZ/p1678129160676939  
      • Backend bug related to PO prefixes and suffixes permissions
      • Additional feedback?
        • So far, mostly OK, though some hurdles at the beginning
        • A-M will add to known issues on the UAT form: If create an open order with Create inventory = None, but with Inventory actions in the job profile, Inventory records will be created, but the POL links and receiving pieces will not be. 
      • Some UI changes underway, based on recent discussions; will be included in Orchid release
        • Very confusing to look at the changes one by one
        • Hopefully will be more clear to the users after they are all in place
        • UI and handling logic changes will be made in the next couple of weeks and will roll out to the UAT site within a day or two after the Snapshot change, and to Orchid Bugfest within a week or so after the Snapshot change
      • A-M will consolidate the feedback next week and discuss with subgroup; so far, no showstoppers
    • Review/confirm mockup for revised log for multiple holdings/items
      • See slide deck - just the log JSON for today
        • Holdings and Item JSON screens look fine; not confusing
      • Is there a non-edge use case for trying to create/update multiple holdings with the same perm loc from the same MARC Bib?

Upcoming meetings/agenda topics:

  • 15 March
    • Helpful? FOLIO Production Library Import Statistics
    • Review the final requirements for multi holdings/items
    • Review work from log subgroup and proposed updates in Poppy
    • Review of ISRI multiple profile UAT, Orders UAT, Bugfest
  • 22 March
    • Discuss Poppy scope
    • Discuss/review mockups for MARC updates refinements
  • Misc
    • POL/VRN matching
      • For invoices, we only consider open POs
      • For Instance, Holdings, Items, we currently (Orchid and before) only consider open POs. Should we change the Inventory matching logic to allow matching on closed POs as well?
    • Deleting outdated versions of SRS records
      • Can we define a cutoff date? 90 days ago? 1 year ago?
        • Different for records that are used during import and then not consulted again? (e.g. EDIFACT invoices, MARC bibs that only create/update orders, holdings, items)
      • Effects on the import log
    • OCLC number cleanup
      • Confirm 035 structure, aim for it to be consistent across all FOLIO tenants
    • Downloading log info
      • Lots of interest, especially for errors
      • Including identifiers for everything
      • What would UI look like?
      • What would output look like? 
    • Variation between PTF and production library performance results - why?

Log

Christie Thomas (she/her)  to  Everyone 1:55 PM
It would be great if these transaction only records could not be saved and definitely not saved as actual.
From a log perspective I don’t think that we need to know anything about the record that is created as a part of the back end processing. In the log I only care about the sis record that is connected to the instance.
I have to leave for another meeting. Thank you for the update.

Taylor Smith  to  Everyone 2:02 PM
thanks!

  • No labels