Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2020-11-12 Metadata Management Meeting notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Date

please put an 'x' next to your name in the list below the "Discussion items" if you are attending. Thanks!

Recordings

Recordings of meetings can be found in the Metadata_Management_SIG > Recordings folder on Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B7G8S7WF6N20YUM4My1oRTIxSHM

Discussion items

PC update

Notes from today's meeting

Note especially:

  • MARCcat: May be discussed at next week's at PC with Harry and Ann-Marie, or a future PC meeting.
    • How does FOLIO attract libraries to the community if there is no internal working MARC cataloging tool? If there was not a full MARC cataloging tool in FOLIO, what does that do to the adoptability of FOLIO?
    • Next week, be prepared to talk about what your library is doing in terms of MARC cataloging
      • Some are editing in consortial systems and moving data in/out of FOLIO, and not storing MARC in FOLIO
      • Some are editing in OCLC and importing/exporting, with QM for small updates
      • Others?
    • To date, only 4 libraries are requiring MARC Holdings, and resources haven’t been allocated to that development work yet
    • What resources does your organization have to help this along?
    • If more resources need to be put into a MARC cataloging tool in FOLIO, what areas get set aside or delayed due to resource constraints?

What do we really need from a MARC cataloging tool? 

Can we ask at Cult to hand over the code, and put a focused development team on this? The problem is there are limitations in available developers. Has there been any analysis on whether or not the work that at Cult has done can be used and developed upon? This will be part of the PC conversation - these assessments. Ann-Marie has been in conversation with Scan Bit and at Cult. They would like to get a "scratch environment" set up - an environment not connected to FOLIO, but something we can test. 

Laura wants to make sure each institution's product council rep knows what members of the MM SIG think.


PC Vision & Strategy

+ New Governance Model

Laura E Daniels

Introduction

Vision and strategy paper

Comments and feedback are requested and will be accepted until Thursday, November 12, 2020

New Governance Model

Feedback on new governance model


Future MM meetings (ongoing)

Add ideas here

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u1tvfVxn6i3fTImrWWCYHlh7RT5cf3_G7YgDuxKob4M/edit



present?

Name

Organization


Aaron TrehubAuburn
xAnn-Marie BreauxEBSCO

Ann KardosUMass Amherst

x

Charlotte WhittIndex Data
xChristie ThomasChicago
     xChristin Seegerthbz

Colin Van AlstineSmith (FC)

Damian Biagi

Dennis BridgesStacks

Dennis ChristmanDuke University
     Douglas ChorpitaGoethe Uni Frankfurt

Dracine HodgesDuke University
regrets

Felix Hemme

ZBW

Filip Jakobsen

Jacquie SamplesDuke University

Jason KovariCornell

Jenn ColtCornell

Jennifer EustisUMass Amherst

Jessica JaneckiDuke University
xJoshua BartonMichigan State

Kristen WilsonIndex Data

Laura Daniels (Wright)Cornell

Lisa FurubottenTexas A&M
xLisa McCollLehigh University

Lisa SjögrenChalmers

Lynn Whittenberger
xMagda ZacharskaEBSCO

Martina Schildt

VZG


Molly DriscollEBSCO

Nancy Lorimer

Stanford


Natascha OwensChicago

Niels Erik Nielsen

Patty WanningerEBSCO

Rita AlbrechtHeBIS-Verbundzentrale

Sara ColglazierMHC/5C

Tiziana Possemato

Theodor Tolstoy

EBSCO


Wayne Schneider

Index Data


        xJesse LambertonUniversity of Chicago

Raegan WiechertMissouri States University
  • No labels