Date
Attendees
- Andrea Loigman
- Kai Sprenger
- Sharon Wiles-Young
- Darcy Branchini
- Mark Canney
- Kim Ammons
- Cate Boerema (Deactivated)
- Emma Boettcher
- lisa perchermeier
- Kimie Kester
- Elizabeth Chenette
- Steven Turner
- Rameka Barnes
- William Weare
- (OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee
- Catherine Smith
- Anya
- David Bottorff
- Jana Freytag
Discussion Items
| Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 min | Housekeeping | Andrea Loigman |
| |
| 10min | Loans | Emma Boettcher | Anonymized and closed loans | At what point is information like patron group, effective location, etc. "frozen" on a closed loan? At anonymization? When closed? And what data is captured - values for those fields at the start of the loan, or at the end? |
| 45min | Requests | Cate Boerema (Deactivated) | Re-ranking requests | Review gap analysis ranking on UXPROD |
Meeting Outcomes
Functional Area | Product Owner | Planned Release (if known) | Decision Reached | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| e.g. loans, fees/fines | Name | e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019 | ||
| Loans | Emma Boettcher | Though information such as patron group or item's effective location may change over the course of the loan, it is most important for reporting to know what those values were at the time the item was loaned, as opposed to when the loan closed. | Very important for reporting, perhaps less important for viewing closed loan details. |