Date
Attendees
@Mark Canney
Discussion tems
Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals |
---|---|---|---|---|
5min | Housekeeping |
| ||
40min | Request and loan policies | Cate Boerema (Deactivated) | Review new mockups and discuss if the settings are now in the right place for request management Recall interval and Cate will verify the return interval and minimum guaranteed period computation Default request policy for requests and have the option to specify request policy --Shawn will lead a discussion on this Cate asked questions about pickup location for requests-remote campuses/remote users so need the pick up location choice Item status in parking lot for requests policy Rush recall type of requests? Do we need this type? | |
20min | Circulate non-circulating items | Discuss failed checkout- policy says item should not circulate-options: Ask user due date and time- change due date; override failed check out then system asks user to select a loan policy which option? Go with option modify due date and will the system fall back or default to loan rule? Emma will check with Shawn 2 scenarios: no loan policy–this item cannot be loaned | Decide scope of override: apply new policy, or just set due date | |
20min (only if we have extra time–this is a lower priority than other 2 agenda items) | Disabling and deleting service points | Cate Boerema (Deactivated) | What if a SP is created by accident or is no longer in use? Deleting SPs is challenging because of the various dependencies. Should we inactivate instead? What's the expected behavior in both cases for locations, requests and loans that use the SP? |
Meeting Outcomes
Functional Area | Product Owner | Planned Release (if known) | Decision Reached | Reasoning | Link to Supporting Materials | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
e.g. loans, fees/fines | Name | e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019 | Clearly stated decision |
| e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue | |