Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2017-09-21 Metadata Management Meeting Notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Date

Attendees

Goals

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
 Product Council updateMichael WinklerMichael Winkler reported that the Product Council is focused on governance at the moment. Lynn invited members of this SIG to attend Product Council meetings and report back.
 Folio Forum Facilitatiors updatejdolivarez

Event: Resource Access SIG Report
Time: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 11:00AM EST / 1600 GMT
Register: Here

The Resource Access SIG (special interest group) was convened in January of 2017 with a charge of defining essential circulation functions and informing developers of the interactions needed for successful resource sharing.

Who are the SIG members? How do they proceed? What have they helped produce so far?

Come and join us for a discussion and demonstration of current development in Resource Access.

Host: Sharon Wiles-Young, Lehigh University

Presenters:

  • ·  Debra Lamb, Cornell University
  • ·  Cate Boerema, EBSCO
 Linked Data W/G update 
 Cataloging App discussion

Question raised by Holly M.- is an external app to edit catalog records OK? what functions/features would be needed / desired; what encoding editors (other than MARC) might be needed? What editors are available now - what are pros/cons of those existing editors?

excerpt: email from Charlotte W.:

Filip and I have just begun the work fleshing out the UX design of the Inventory App, and in that connection we're fully aware, that we need to talk more in depth with the MM-SIG about what 3rd party cataloging tool to implement for FOLIO V1. 

... it would be extremely useful if we together could list different 3rd party cataloging tools, which could be possible solutions as cataloging tools to implement for V1.

I would suggest that we qualify the list with comments/notes, and write up e.g. strengths (pros), weaknesses (cons), etc., and then review the list with the MM SIG, and get feed back from the group.

excerpt: email from Peter M:

the design of the Codex is that edits are made in the source record and those changes flow to the Codex record.  There will not be a way to edit a Codex record directly.
And to refresh everyone's memory, the FOLIO design allows for many sources of descriptive records: MARC, Dublin Core, BIBFRAME, etc. ... Each source of descriptive records will have one or more editors.  
In the case of the MARC silo, the leading candidate for an editor for v1 is leveraging Terry Reese's MarcEdit application.  To the best of my knowledge, there are no user stories yet for editors for Dublin Core, BIBFRAME, and others.  Given the time that we have remaining for v1, creating a web-native editor for MARC is considered out of scope.
For what its worth, in the initial conversations with Terry, it seems possible and likely that MarcEdit itself will be able to communicate directly with FOLIO data storage mechanisms.  For instance, within MarcEdit one could search FOLIO, retrieve a single record or a group of records, make edits, and push them directly into FOLIO without needing to go through the web browser.  Hopefully this capability will remove some of the friction of not having a browser-native MARC editor.
 Parking lot space for MM SIG issuesAnn-Marie Breaux (Deactivated)MM SIG Parking Lot; are there other issues we should add to the parking lot?

Action items

  •  
  • No labels