Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2024-02-08 Product Council Agenda and Meeting Notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Jesse Koennecke Tod Olson Peter Murray \uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

Note taker:

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

Decisions and Actions

5 min

Announcements

all

Paul Moeller is organizing the Asian-Pacific meeting - to be held on 2/21 (2/22)

5 min

Intro and overview of Evaluation Process for New FOLIO Functionality process


Kristin Martin

The process was described by the Scope Criteria WG. The PC is in general working on app level. This is defined in the FOLIO Terminology document. MOU on code. Functional values defined by the PC.

Technical criteria defined by the TC.
There is a link in the TCR criteria to the PC’s doc Evaluation Process for New FOLIO Functionality

The PC do not deal with

  1. (insert)…

  2. (insert)…

  3. code not distributed by FOLIO

The TC is planning to start TC reviews before the PC review to ease the time pressure for development teams.

PC maintain a decision log

40 min

Discussion/Retro of Evaluation Process for New FOLIO Functionality pilot

all

https://easyretro.io/publicboard/upBxQMrG7FZiIsCVSdEHUhZXbRv1/8974e786-ac3c-4dec-bdbc-b61590199880

See the cards in the retro board.

The general rule will be, if a PO is in doubt of a presentation for PC is relevant, then ask.

The PC is interested in early information, and ideally before the app/module is build.

Harry pointed out, that much development is happening by vendors for given customers. Kirstin Martin underlined, that the PC’s role is to provide qualitative input and make the planned work even better for everyone.

5 min

Future topics

all

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels