Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

https://zoom.us/j/867230970

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

5 min

Announcements

all

  • Linked Open Data subgroup is now a SIG

  • Yogesh Kumar sees new Bugfest testers but number of claimed test cases is still low (~650); more people need to engage to reach our goal to finish Bugfest till end of month.

    • Jeremy is about to send out a notice on behalf of PC => sent by email.

  • Jana Freytag: RA SIG seeks new co-convenor (successor for Jana); Jana can do onboarding; should be announced on general slack channel and also reached out to individuals

50 min

Prioritization rollout in the SIGs

Kristin Martin Martina Schildt

Review of Prioritization process in Acquisition SIG:

Acquisitions/Resource Management implementers

Prioritization

Desired outcome: Jira dashboard of features identified as SIG priorities that may not be slated for a release, but can be picked up by development teams.

Questions for discussion:

  • Do you already have a mechanism for your SIG for collecting priorities?

  • Are priorities represented in Jira or through another means?

  • Do you keep a topic backlog/topic page that you can draw on to develop priorities?

  • Are there dormant features that should be revisited?

  • What barriers do you have in collecting priorities?

  • What do you think would be a good time frame for collecting priorities?

  • What can the PC do to help your SIG with this work?

Martina Schildt opens topic by quickly presenting how ACQ SIG is doing prioritisation:

  • Wiki page (see above) for implementer topics; every community member can add topics; topics will be discussed in SIG and wiki page item is updated

  • For each topic a Jira ticket is created; a ticket is given certain labels special to the SIG; each ticket can be voted with the like button (upper right)

  • High votes do not garantee timely development, but developers can orient on that if they have spare dev time

  • Jira dashboard with most voted tickets

  • Kristin: Roll out of this process to other SIGs; not necessarily exactly the same; every SIG has their own special situation; this shall start a discussion in rolling out prioritisation process

Discussion of Questions above: (not final, Martin needs to consult recordings)

  • Jana: RA SIG has gap list, every institutions picks theri 5 most important topics, work through it in meetings, no real voting process Gap list RA SIG

    • Existing Jira tickets are searched and linked

    • if no ticket exists in Jira, a ticket is created by person responsible for the gap

      • there are trainings for creating tickets => Kristin: it would be great to share this with others as well; in chat: there are wiki pages for that: Getting Started for Product Owners

      • Martina: if voting would be added, a Dashboard could be created for the list

    • are tags/labels used for tickets? => currently not; RA SIG has a lot of different apps/modules and providing tags would be a prerequisite for a meaningful dashboard

      • There is need for volunteers for tagging the tickets

  • Martina: ERM has similar system as ACQ SIG; more reluctant in creating Jira tickets; ERM SIG is willing to adjust process

  • Laura: LD SIG still has small parking lot, currently planning meetings is more of a topic and currently there are also no implementers; the prioritisation process will be future meeting topic, important for tracking community prios and community impact

  • Laura: MM SIG is more difficult, difficult to come to an agreement on priorities as institutions have very different needs; challenge to agree on SIG’s priority

    • Alexis: there need no necessary be agreement; priorities should surface needs

  • Kristin: AI SIG have spreadsheet;

    • more info from spreadsheet should go into Jira; tags should be used to appear in dashboards

    • Surface issues on Dashboards can help people get active if they’re unsatisfied in Folio

  • Martina: cleaning up the tickets is important

  • Laura: things that have been thin-threaded/half implemented should be revisited, what approaches are there?

    • Kristin: timing would be good now for that; but such things may not be visible in Jira as they may have been removed or be marked as done; some kind of survey/brainstorming would have to be done

    • Jana: going though backlogs and closing deprecated features was very helpful and removed load

  • Caitlin: Jira tickets can be bulk updated, eg. add labels; admin permissions are needed; Holly used to do it; Permissions may need to be adjusted. Peter can look into it. New feature in Jira cloud: Export/Import with Google sheets

  • => there should be a recorded session about creating and maintaining tickets

  • Sharon: Reporting SIG use github issues, easier and faster to organise for their needs; with Reporting app SIG returns to Jira. Meta DB is managed through github issues.

    • Charlotte: mod-reporting, ui-ldp and mod-ldp all were managed with JIRA

  • Charlotte: It would be useful if all members had permissions to use tags to label tickets; ?

  • Kristin: Prioritisation rollout till Trillium; but usable beginning next year; standardized tagset for better search

  • Martina: How can the PC help convenors discuss / roll out this process in SIGs

  • Sharon: maybe there should be a Jira support group; Caitlin in chat: maybe a slack channel

    • nobody should not to get their things done because they don’t know Jira

  • Charlotte: When talking to devs: If it isn’t in Jira, it doesn’t exist

  • Tod: this topic parallels with lifecycle of definition of done in different teams

5 min

Future topics

all

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions