Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Meeting time: 8:30 AM (EST) / 1:30 PM (BST) / 2:30 PM (CEST)

Meeting URL: https://openlibraryfoundation.zoom.us/j/82643780981 (Password required)

OA Working Group Wiki: Open Access SIG Home

Google Drive Folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HR1JyDkUeRE0kL1eBKcu6uIvcNcnn352?usp=sharing

...

Minutes

    • OS: Q for the end of this session: Is there anything we missed regarding this area?
    • Going through the document
    • OS: Q re: statements about contingent availability in the document
      • EDS: In case of prepayment, want to see how many articles or money left
      • MB: There are vouchers as well
      • OS: prepayment situation with publisher and/or consortium?
        • EDS: publisher for sure, consortium not sure
      • OS: report about availability from publisher?
        • EDS: normaly via email or dashboard
        • AO: only at the end of the year with invoice information whether there is anything left, no overview during the year some times, need to keep track by themselves
      • OS: number of vouchers can vary?
        • EDS: yes, vary; one voucher = one publication
      • OS: vouchers part of contract or consortia?
        • EDS: one example IIIE
        • AO: example via chat:

          Springer and received the following information: "Regarding the tokens, he said that there will be a common pool of tokens from all participating institutions. Institutions with Tier 2-5 will be able to publish all their publications OA without having to pay additional costs, even if the tokens should be used up. Institutions with Tier 1 should, if the tokens should be depleted, publish the articles then still awaiting publication behind the paywall, i.e. not OA, if they do not want to pay the APC for the articles.

        • MB: IOP - 
      • OS: vouchers always connected with one publisher? or are there vouchers across many publisher?
        • EDS: 1:1 so far
      • OS: specific voucher numbers?
        • MB: no specific voucher numbers
        • PMC: vouchers with exp date
      • OS: availabilty of third party funds?
        • PMC: small fund that the library provides; most used in first month of the year
        • EDS: univ. offers money to the institutes; this would be third party fund; also if research fund itself contains publication 
        • EDS: always looking for other funding streams, if not, then via library/publication fund
        • EDS: but we record request even if we do not pay
        • MB: cost sharing; sometimes authors have some money; paying complete invoice but invoice the author subsequently
    • OS: Q re: statement some institutions do not fund publ in hybrid journals
      • OS: checking whether journal is listed in a directory, is there a different in checking to other things to check?
      • MB: hybrid only if it's part of a transformative agreement
      • MB: Gold OA fund and transformative agreement
      • EDS and OA: it depends on the contract; if contract includes hybrid journals, then it will be paid
    • OS: relationship between author and department; experience shows that this is quite flexible
    • OS: books, no focus at the moment
    • OS: DFG specific?! 
      • AO: what we need to know/check/record is from what project comes this publication? FactScience/RIS contains information about whether research is funded by DFG; or ask authors or check publication metadata
      • OS: The main question is: Who funded the research that the publication is about/from → then decision 
    • OS: are the authors specify a specific journal they want to publish in?
      • EDS: it depends, sometimes they ask or wish to have a specific publisher, sometimes journal
    • OS: article types: do we have a more broad classification or deeper one? number of types
      • MB: a more large number, e.g. Wiley 100+ lines; MB will provide OS Wiley example
      • AO and EDS: special prices depending on article type
    • Colour and page fees payed and tracked, excluded?
      • CL: do not fund but pay and invoice / pass on to the author
      • PMC: not heard of any limitations, but have to investigate
    • OS: any other things that need to be tracked that are not part of pre-decision process? Have to check afterwards?
      • AO: funding statement of research itself and publication OA funding have to be checked
      • OS: do you have at the moment a method of checking this?
      • AO: yes, publication text and publ metadata; just track "that" it was checked and found/or not
    • OS: complain if not complient; communication with publisher; is that something you want to track over time?
      • EDS: example of wrong or no OA licence, ask to change the license, but if publisher don't want, no further asking
      • can be a long period of communication
    • OS: is there anything we missed regarding this subject, missed to asked etc.?
      • please think about during the week

Attendees list

Present

Name

Home Organization

x

Owen Stephens

K-Int

xIan IbbotsonK-Int
xGill OsguthorpeK-Int
xBjörn MuschallUL Leipzig

Christina PrellUL Regensburg

Caroline ZieglerUL LMU Munich

Volker SchallehnUL LMU Munich

Vanessa GabrielUL LMU Munich
xEloisa Deola SchennerleinSLUB Dresden
xLisa SchäferZBW
xMartin BauschmannUL Leipzig

Peter SbrzesnySUB Göttingen

Mona OrloffZBW
xAstrid OrthSUB Göttingen
xCornelia Lang

UL Regensburg

(proxy Christina Prell)

xPeter McCrackenCornell University
xEthanK-Int Dev
xSam HepburnK-Int Dev
xFrank Manista

JISC UK