Page Comparison

• Hey Guys - I'm running late. Sorry! I'll hop on when I can. - Lynn

Meeting was this morning.

• The Product Council was joined by Ivo Contursi, @Cult (http://www.atcult.it/en/) a represented from Italian Company that is interested in participating with FOLIO.
• The Product Council will be updating its charge. A PC Executive Committee will be established. There is a question as to what the role of the Stragetic Director of OLE will be.
• There is work being done to plan a FOLIO conference.

Charlotte Whitt added that she particpated in the @Cult demo, and found it very interesting. They working with conversion among several formats.

Inventory UX demo

Postponed until 10/12 - Filip will be on vacation

• folioproject.proto.io and on the discuss channel https://discuss.folio.org/t/instances-ux-iteration-3-english/1271
  Discussion/Review of questions Filip posed on the discuss channel. Thanks to everyone who has responded to date!
• Questions:
  
  1. Can holdings records be optional?
  2. If there are cases with no holding records - what situations could that be?
  3. Would you create a new holding record if different locations?
  4. Would you create a holding record if there is only one item?
  5. How often do you edit holdings records?
  6. Should we display holdings records together with the item data?
  7. How would you relink to different holdings records, if e.g. an item record is moved from on holdings-record to another - by drag and drop ?
  8. Do holdings data get imported, in other situations than when migration of a collection?
  9. When editing a holding record, would that preferrably be in MARC format?

Holdings for journals and electronic journals are also being considered. Charlotte presented a wireframe that shared. Her wireframe is modeled after the metadata elements presented by Katheryn.

Charlotte first showed an electronic journal with a lot of holdings information. The results column is something Charlotte would be interested in receiving feedback on: too much? too little?

The instance data information - too much? too little?

Instance - Contains holdings data. The Copy data shows a summarized holdings statement (one that is extremely long, for purposes of modelling.

Laura asked if the note showing is associated with the instance. Can this information appear in multiple places? Does the information need to be duplicated elsewhere?

Jason wondered what the functional requirement that the instance view provides? Charlotte - Right now it is intended for the context of the inventory. Jason - This context is helpful.

Charlotte then showed an electronic version of American Journal of Medicine. Charlotte linked to the print version. The link should go both ways

Lisa Furubotten mentioned that there may be records in current systems that have various formats represented in one bibliographic record. How will this be handled by FOLIO?

Charlotte ask Lisa to send a records.

Felix thinks a link to a related version is great, but wondered if the notes field is the appropriate place. Since "notes" is just a free text field typically.

Lynn thought that Filip's demo had a place for a related version. Charlotte will talk with Filip.

Proposed MARC mappings. See column 3 in https://wiki.folio.org/display/PLATFORM/Inventory+Metadata+Elements: need a small group of 1-2 hard-core catalogers to go over?

Ask colleagues / give suggestions to Lynn&Charlotte of colleagues who have cataloging expertise in special formats (music, audio-visual material, cartographic material etc.) to review existing metadata elements & suggest any additions

Thread about the inventory metadata elements on discuss: https://discuss.folio.org/t/august-31st-meeting-inventory-documentation/1229