Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

PC updateFormer user (Deleted)

Agenda/Minutes

The SIG conveners announced that the charge for SIGs will be "refreshed".  Design, development, documentation, user acceptance testing, discussions with libraries that have implements all need to be included so the charge reflects the realities and SIG members expectations will be clear.

From chat (has there been any discussion of surveying SMEs for their experiences in SIGs? ) answer from chat (not yet)

Forum coming, to understand the future

Putting together a survey, and there may be some drafting and work-shopping the draft before sent


Other updates, announcements

Minute taker conversation (what to do?)

    • self identify minute takers
    • a pool? Jacquie S, Jennifer E, Jesse L
  • There is a new lead PO: Kelly Drake
    • from chat: But Kelly will also take on: Bulk/batch edit and also Title level request 
    • Kelly is still PO for consortia
    • Charlotte is still doing Item Status

German Folio Days Feb 24 / 25 2021: https://www.folio-bib.org/?page_id=1189 including a presentation and demo about CBS2Inventory (union catalogue integration for GBV).


Mode of Issuance, Other Reference Data:

deviating from defaults (such as note types, identifier types, alternative title types)

RDA elements have been significantly changed: now two options "single unit" or "multiple unit"

https://www.rdaregistry.info/termList/ModeIssue/

Do we want these values to follow RDA? a different vocabulary source/model?

Remarks on the implementation of the new RDA Toolkit (by Rita):

Question from Felix: The proposed new MARC field 335 Extension Plan seems related to the change of the "mode of issuance" values. Can someone explain if the fields are introduced together and belong together, similar to content, carrier, and media type? 

(Rita) The element "extension plan" is an attribute of the entity work while "mode of issuance" is an attribute of manifestation.

http://rdaregistry.info/Elements/w/P10365 | Vocabulary encoding scheme → http://www.rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAExtensionPlan/

For DACH so far no decision has been made about implementing the new element.

 Deleting SRS MARC bib recordsAnn-Marie Breaux (Deactivated)

impact on Inventory Instance records

  • update on conversation in data-import subgroup (right now, no delete)
  • updates on MARC will update the Instance from SRS
    • currently, instances can not be deleted if there is SRS
  • from chat (Underlying SRS record is a dependency for deletion of the instance record)
  • If the Instance is deleted, the MARC would also be deleted (agreement from group)
    • no 'free-floating' MARC
  • at some point, an action to delete records will be added to an import profile
  • Image Added
Documentation...
standard placeholder

...