Page Comparison

Mode of Issuance, Other Reference Data:

deviating from defaults (such as note types, identifier types, alternative title types)

RDA elements have been significantly changed: now two options "single unit" or "multiple unit"

https://www.rdaregistry.info/termList/ModeIssue/

Do we want these values to follow RDA? a different vocabulary source/model?

Remarks on the implementation of the new RDA Toolkit (by Rita):

• "PCC will not be implementing new RDA Toolkit before July 2022" (see https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/PoCo-2020/newRDA%20ImpementationPlanNov2.pdf)
• The German speaking community (DACH) has not yet set a date, but implementation will not start before 2022.
• "The National Library of Sweden has decided to await work on the new Toolkit. A transistionto the updated RDA requires considerable resources for translation as well as for work with Swedish practice, instructions, training etc. and we have come to the conclusion that we don’t have these resources, at least not in 2020" (Survey conducted by EURIG, see http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/RDA%20in%20Europe%20May%202020_0.pdf)
  

Question from Felix: The proposed new MARC field 335 Extension Plan seems related to the change of the "mode of issuance" values. Can someone explain if the fields are introduced together and belong together, similar to content, carrier, and media type? 

(Rita) The element "extension plan" is an attribute of the entity work while "mode of issuance" is an attribute of manifestation.

→ http://rdaregistry.info/Elements/w/P10365

For DACH so far no decidion decision has been made about implementing the new element.