Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Sprint Goal / Focus 

  •  

Sprint Schedule

  • Sprint: 185
  • Release: 2024.1 Quesnalia 
    • Sprint 10 of 11 since Release Development Cycle Starts (Sprint 176) to Feature Freeze (Sprint 186: 15 Mar 2024)
    • Sprint 187: Module Release Deadline (22 Mar 2024) [FOLREL-565]
    • Sprint 189: Bugfix Release Deadline (19 Apr 2024) [FOLREL-581]

Development Meetings

  • Wed 21 Feb - 
  • Mon 26 Feb - backlog review
  • Wed 28 Feb - dev update

Sprint Capacity

Team AvailabilitySchedule | Calendar

Notes / Exceptions:

Lead Roles:

QA Environment: 

  • folio-snapshot, folio-snapshot-2

Present


Info
titlePlanning Questions
  • Does the issue meet the criteria for Definition of Ready?
  • What front and back end components are affected?
  • What changes need to be made? (additions, removals or modifications)
  • What development tests need to be written?  
  • What data does the developer need to verify their work?
  • What are the known unknowns? 
  • What is needed to QA? (environment, data, scripts)

Navigation

Table of Contents

Expand
titleSprint Planning Agenda
  1. Sprint Goal / Focus
  2. Sprint Capacity
  3. Review sprint candidates 
  4. Agree technical approach / define key implementation tasks
  5. Finalise estimates / costings
  6. Confirm sprint scope
  7. Confirm first actions





Sprint Planning  

(error) - not in sprint

(tick) or @ - in sprint 

(warning) - not ready

(question) - pending triage / planning

Sprint Focus

Info
iconfalse
titlePlanning Notes Template
  • Triage

  • Approach
  • Components and Changes

    • Frontend

    • Backend

  • Tests / Data / Dependencies

  • Known Unknowns

  • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

  • Release Target: 
  • Development Estimate


Monireh Rasouli3048 Owen Stephens

Issue ID

Sprint Backlog?

Notes / Estimates / Actions

Carried Over

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyERM-1910


Jira Legacystatus
serversubtleSystem JIRAtrue
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyERM-3119
titleTestrails

Sprint 180

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyERM-31203063


Status
subtletrue
colourYellow
titleTestrailsQA

Sprint 180176

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyERM-30632792

Status
subtletrue
colourYellowBlue
titleQAOPEN

Sprint 176178

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyERM-31212793

Status
subtletrue
colourYellowGreen
titleQAIn Progress

Sprint 180178

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyERM-31283090

(question) Steve Osguthorpe

Status
subtletrue
colourYellowBlue
titleQACode Review

(warning) Sprint 182180

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyERM-31273111


Sprint 178

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyERM-2793

Status
subtletrue
colourGreen
titleIn Progress

Sprint 178

Status
subtletrue
colourBlueRed
titleCode Review

Sprint 182

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyERM-2792

Status
subtletrue
colourBlue
titleOPEN

Ready TO PROGESS
 

  • Triage

    • previously created new Grails 6 project and incrementally added components
    • once pitfalls identified, each module took very little time
  • Approach
    • will starting up a new grails project with the CLI even work?
  • Components and Changes

    • Frontend

    • Backend

  • Tests / Data / Dependencies

    • gradle upgrade is necessary
  • Known Unknowns

    • will starting up a new grails project with the CLI even work?
  • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

  • Release Target: 
  • Development Estimate

  • Current:
    • grails and gradle versions determined
    • web-toolkit passing tests
    • smoother process than 4 to 5, but integration is inevitably 
  • TODO
    • service-interaction failing
    • need to build into okapi environment
      • may need to rebuild rancher, which could be risky at the moment
    • review migrations, but difficult to triage atm


 

  • Release candidate for Grails 6 and okapi ready
  • Should be ready to move forward
  • Once merged, cannot backport to Poppy

Sprint 182

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyERM-31263078


Status
subtletrue
colour

Blue

Green
Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
title

Code Review

Sprint 182

In Progress

  • enforceVersionCheck is taken from grails default rest controller - not sure of impact to changing from false to true
  • can add to to yaml without changing default to false
  • would need to make changes to KIWT restful controller
  • need to push version numbers
  • likely not to be rolled in until Grails 6
  • TODO: 
    • Jack to write up findings 
    • Owen to review with users

(warning) Sprint 178

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyERM-3090

(question) Steve Osguthorpe

Status
subtletrue
colourBlue
titleCode Review

(warning) Sprint 180

3089

(minus)


(warning) Sprint 178

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keySI-34


(warning) Sprint 173

Components and Changes

  • Frontend

  • Backend

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERMSI-3111
    Status
    subtletrue
    colourRed
    titleReady TO PROGESS
     

  • Triage

    • previously created new Grails 6 project and incrementally added components
    • once pitfalls identified, each module took very little time
  • Approach
    • will starting up a new grails project with the CLI even work?
  • 38


    (warning) Sprint 179

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3133

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3089

    (minus)

    (warning) Sprint 178

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keySI-34

    (warning) Sprint 173
    • Triage

      • FOLIO session-level
    • Approach
      • review implementation across other apps
        • eg, Orders, 
        • eg, stripes-smart-components useColumnManager 
      • can this be used as-is within ERM or does it need streamlining?
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend: TBC

      • Backend: none

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

      • gradle upgrade is necessary

      Known Unknowns

      will starting up a new grails project with the CLI even work

      : ??

    • Known Unknowns: ??

    • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

    • Release Target:  Quesnelia
    • Development Estimate

      Current

      :

      • grails and gradle versions determined
      • web-toolkit passing tests
      • smoother process than 4 to 5, but integration is inevitably 
    • TODO
      • service-interaction failing
      • need to build into okapi environment
        • may need to rebuild rancher, which could be risky at the moment
      • review migrations, but difficult to triage atm

     

    • Release candidate for Grails 6 and okapi ready
    • Should be ready to move forward
    • Once merged, cannot backport to Poppy

    Sprint 182

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3078

    Status
    subtletrue
    colourGreen
    titleIn Progress

    • enforceVersionCheck is taken from grails default rest controller - not sure of impact to changing from false to true
    • can add to to yaml without changing default to false
    • would need to make changes to KIWT restful controller
    • need to push version numbers
    • likely not to be rolled in until Grails 6
    • TODO: 
      • Jack to write up findings 
      • Owen to review with users

    (warning) Sprint 178

    • ??


    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3118

    Triage

      • NamedThreadFactory is used in string templating service
      • out of end-of-life support, so should find a  way to upgrade/remove
    • Approach
      • need to review any documented upgrade path - is there a straightforward path to go from 2 to 3
      • are we vulnerable to the jetty-io vulnerabilty?
        • influences backport requirements (esp Orchid which is on Grails 4)
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend: NA

      • Backend: 

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

    • Known Unknowns

      • whether we are affected by virtue of using netty
    • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

    • Release Target: 
    • Development Estimate

    Current: 

    • upgrade path documentation doesn't help
    • looks like (via grep) this is the only use of ehcache

    Sprint 182

    • need to decide whether to bail ehcache to use another NamedFactory provider
    • potentially could do this internally, without another dependency
    • run gradle clean  and check dependencies to see if ehcache/jetty-io are brought in transitively - CONFIRMED on v2

    Sprint 183

    • Current
      • NamedThreadFactory doesn't seem critical or fancy
      • and it looks like it's only in mod-agreements
      • inclination is to create own version
    • TODO: 
      • check with Steve
        • is ehcache being used elsewhere?
        • can we sue our own thread factory
      • try ehcache 3
    • Decision on way forward by Wed 24 Jan

    Sprint 182

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keySIERM-38

    (warning) Sprint 179

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3133

  • Triage

    • FOLIO session-level
  • Approach
    • review implementation across other apps
      • eg, Orders, 
      • eg, stripes-smart-components useColumnManager 
    • can this be used as-is within ERM or does it need streamlining?
  • Components and Changes

  • Frontend: TBC

  • Backend: none

    3125

    (error) Not vulnerable

    • Triage

      • need to revisit what choice we made for Poppy
      • need to check whether Orchid/Poppy have the same vulnerability to determine backport requirement
      • otherwise to be dealt with (for Quesnalia) by Grails 6 upgrade
    • Approach
      • Prefer not to patch grails, but should be able to bump data-binding 
      • Try 4.1.3, then 4.1.2, then 4.1.1
      • Otherwise will need to change databindings specifically - which will be messy
      • Owen: release plan
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend: NA

      • Backend: mod-agreements, mod-licenses, mod-service-interaction

        • shouldn't need grails-okapi or KIWT
    • Tests / Data / Dependencies: ??

    • Known Unknowns: ??QA: snapshot |

      • what's the minimum version that has the fix?
      • confirm that  grails-okapi and KIWT do not need bumping
    • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

      • dev: does it compile and run as expected?
      • regression testing
    • Release Target: QuesneliaNA
    • Development Estimate: ??NA

    Sprint 182

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3118
    (tick) Jack Golding  
    3130


    • Triage

      • NamedThreadFactory is used in string templating service
      • out of end-of-life support, so should find a  way to upgrade/remove
    • Approach
      • need to review any documented upgrade path - is there a straightforward path to go from 2 to 3
      • are we vulnerable to the jetty-io vulnerabilty?influences backport requirements (esp Orchid which is on Grails 4)fetch of loadMore is causing cache of what's opened to refresh
        • fetch is at rootLevel, so redraw pushes a different set of lines
      • which may be because of batch fetching PO lines 
      • redraw closes and remounts 
    • Approach
      • needs investigation to understand chain of events leading to invalidation or refresh
        • what's the trigger?
        • is there a quick fix? 
        • if not will need a refactor of PO line fetch handling
      • Owen to revisit whether this is an issue in current versions (tick)
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend: NAui-agreements

      • Backend:  NA

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

    • Known Unknowns

      • whether we are affected by virtue of using netty
    • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

    • Release Target: 
    • Development Estimate

    Current: 

    • upgrade path documentation doesn't help
    • looks like (via grep) this is the only use of ehcache

    Sprint 182

    • need to decide whether to bail ehcache to use another NamedFactory provider
    • potentially could do this internally, without another dependency
    • run gradle clean  and check dependencies to see if ehcache/jetty-io are brought in transitively - CONFIRMED on v2

    Sprint 183

  • Current
    • NamedThreadFactory doesn't seem critical or fancy
    • and it looks like it's only in mod-agreements
    • inclination is to create own version
  • TODO: 
    • check with Steve
      • is ehcache being used elsewhere?
      • can we sue our own thread factory
    • try ehcache 3
  • Decision on way forward by Wed 24 Jan
      • none for now, potentially add to testrails catalog
    • Known Unknowns

      • then need to decide what's desirable behaviour - do we need to retain the user's view or reset it post-redraw?
        • if we don't then any data changes won't be reflected
        • if we do, we need to develop a reusable component for consistency across apps
    • QA: snapshot 

    • Release Target: Quesnelia (no backport)
    • Development Estimate

    Sprint 182

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3131

      

    • Not clear how to verify
    • Need to follow up with Molly

    Sprint 182

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3125

    (error) Not vulnerable

  • Triage

    • need to revisit what choice we made for Poppy
    • need to check whether Orchid/Poppy have the same vulnerability to determine backport requirement
    • otherwise to be dealt with (for Quesnalia) by Grails 6 upgrade
  • Approach
    • Prefer not to patch grails, but should be able to bump data-binding 
    • Try 4.1.3, then 4.1.2, then 4.1.1
    • Otherwise will need to change databindings specifically - which will be messy
    • Owen: release plan
  • Components and Changes

    • Frontend: NA

    • Backend: mod-agreements, mod-licenses, mod-service-interaction

      • shouldn't need grails-okapi or KIWT
  • Tests / Data / Dependencies

  • Known Unknowns

  • what's the minimum version that has the fix?
  • confirm that  grails-okapi and KIWT do not need bumping

    3118



    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-2631

    • Approach

      • set up new open source project in K-Int gitlab
      • new micronaut service required (not using okapi or grails)
      • set up a test instance
      • will need a different dev workflow (probably using local copy of service)
      • working title: pushkb
      • avoid storing caches of transient data
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend: na

      • Backend: new

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

      • Align to when GBV start testing and using pushkb endpoint
      • ERM-3048 Possible package schema changes  with endpoint changes
    • Known Unknowns

      • should be (but not clear yet) about TitleInstance Resolver
      • packageSchemaUpdater: potential conflicts when there are multiple copies of schemas in play where backwards compatibility is broken
    • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

      • dev: does it compile and run as expected?
      • regression testing
    • Release Release Target: NA  Quesnalia
    • Development Estimate: NA

    Sprint 182

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3130

    • Triage

      • fetch of loadMore is causing cache of what's opened to refresh
        • fetch is at rootLevel, so redraw pushes a different set of lines
      • which may be because of batch fetching PO lines 
      • redraw closes and remounts 
    • Approach
      • needs investigation to understand chain of events leading to invalidation or refresh
        • what's the trigger?
        • is there a quick fix? 
        • if not will need a refactor of PO line fetch handling
      • Owen to revisit whether this is an issue in current versions (tick)
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend: ui-agreements

      • Backend: NA

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies: 

      • none for now, potentially add to testrails catalog
    • Known Unknowns

      • then need to decide what's desirable behaviour - do we need to retain the user's view or reset it post-redraw?
        • if we don't then any data changes won't be reflected
        • if we do, we need to develop a reusable component for consistency across apps
    • QA: snapshot 

    • Release Target: Quesnelia (no backport)
    • Development Estimate

    Sprint 182

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3131

    Not clear how to verify

    • Triage

    • Approach
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend

      • Backend

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

    • Known Unknowns

    • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

    • Release Target: 
    • Development Estimate

    Sprint 182


    • Current State
      • pushKb can make a scheduled call (1s, 1h) to Gokb
      • will fetch roughly ~700k TIPPS 
      • Stores these in a local postgres db
      • proteus json transform implemented with proof of concept schema
    • TODO
      • scaling
      • extensive transformation testing
      • write fetch chunks and push to FOLIO,
        • implementing algorithm to ensure no data gaps 
        • deciding what to do with the data volume (700k feels beyond FOLIO's performance capability)
        • at a minimum: need to move the FOLIO side to being not an open http request per chunk (would be killed by  okapi), by, eg, 
          • small batch sizes? would take full day for initial ingest
          • speeding up FOLIO? (not clear how this could be done)
          • move pushKb to background thread (like jobs, but on a much smaller scale)? 
    • Constraints
      • want to avoid jobs being badly interrupted by a docker container being restarted
      • tradeoff is that we have a slower but more stable process 
    • Development Estimate


    Sprint 183

    • Current State
      • modelling in place for setting up destinations, and links to
      • improved bootstrapping
      • working on algorithm to extend source record handling from single to process queue of source records without gaps and error handling
    • TODO
      • scaling
      • extensive transformation testing
      • write fetch chunks and push to FOLIO,
        • implementing algorithm to ensure no data gaps 
        • deciding what to do with the data volume (700k feels beyond FOLIO's performance capability)
        • at a minimum: need to move the FOLIO side to being not an open http request per chunk (would be killed by  okapi), by, eg, 
          • small batch sizes? would take full day for initial ingest
          • speeding up FOLIO? (not clear how this could be done)
          • move pushKb to background thread (like jobs, but on a much smaller scale)? 
        • set up api rather than write straight to db
      • scheduling
      • cleanup
      • then: devops work to make releaseable
      • then: reciprocal changes to mod-agreements
    • Constraints
      • want to avoid jobs being badly interrupted by a docker container being restarted
      • tradeoff is that we have a slower but more stable process 
    • Development Estimate (to minimum): 
      • Functional: end of Sprint 184
      • Agreements Work: 
      • DevOps: need input from Steve and/or Ian (from start of Sprint 185)
    • Release:
      • Quesnalia - balance pushKb with mod-agreements interop
    • Unknown:
      • can we use snapshot to test this>?

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3118
    (question) Ethan Freestone
    3048

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-2631

    • Approach

      • set up new open source project in K-Int gitlab
      • new micronaut service required (not using okapi or grails)
      • set up a test instance
      • will need a different dev workflow (probably using local copy of service)
      • working title: pushkb
      • avoid storing caches of transient data
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend: na

      • Backend: new

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

      • Align to when GBV start testing and using pushkb endpoint
      • ERM-3048 Possible package schema changes  with endpoint changes
    • Known Unknowns

      • should be (but not clear yet) about TitleInstance Resolver
      • packageSchemaUpdater: potential conflicts when there are multiple copies of schemas in play where backwards compatibility is broken
    • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

    • Release Target:  Quesnalia
    • Development Estimate

    • Current State
      • pushKb can make a scheduled call (1s, 1h) to Gokb
      • will fetch roughly ~700k TIPPS 
      • Stores these in a local postgres db
      • proteus json transform implemented with proof of concept schema
    • TODO
      • scaling
      • extensive transformation testing
      • write fetch chunks and push to FOLIO,
        • implementing algorithm to ensure no data gaps 
        • deciding what to do with the data volume (700k feels beyond FOLIO's performance capability)
        • at a minimum: need to move the FOLIO side to being not an open http request per chunk (would be killed by  okapi), by, eg, 
          • small batch sizes? would take full day for initial ingest
          • speeding up FOLIO? (not clear how this could be done)
          • move pushKb to background thread (like jobs, but on a much smaller scale)? 
    • Constraints
      • want to avoid jobs being badly interrupted by a docker container being restarted
      • tradeoff is that we have a slower but more stable process 
    • Development Estimate

    Sprint 183

  • Current State
    • modelling in place for setting up destinations, and links to
    • improved bootstrapping
    • working on algorithm to extend source record handling from single to process queue of source records without gaps and error handling
  • TODO
    • scaling
    • extensive transformation testing
    • write fetch chunks and push to FOLIO,
      • implementing algorithm to ensure no data gaps 
      • deciding what to do with the data volume (700k feels beyond FOLIO's performance capability)
      • at a minimum: need to move the FOLIO side to being not an open http request per chunk (would be killed by  okapi), by, eg, 
        • small batch sizes? would take full day for initial ingest
        • speeding up FOLIO? (not clear how this could be done)
        • move pushKb to background thread (like jobs, but on a much smaller scale)? 
      • set up api rather than write straight to db
    • scheduling
    • cleanup
    • then: devops work to make releaseable
    • then: reciprocal changes to mod-agreements
  • Constraints
    • want to avoid jobs being badly interrupted by a docker container being restarted
    • tradeoff is that we have a slower but more stable process 
  • Development Estimate (to minimum): 
    • Functional: end of Sprint 184
    • Agreements Work: 
    • DevOps: need input from Steve and/or Ian (from start of Sprint 185)
  • Release:
    • Quesnalia - balance pushKb with mod-agreements interop
  • Unknown: can we use snapshot to test this>?
    • Triage

      • needs some investigation work
      • priority is for GOKb
    • Approach
    • Components and Changes

    • Known Unknowns

      • how do we want to track (count) the external (remote) counts? 
        • In the XML for the package rather than database
        • once the package XML is in hand, count all TIPPs with status=current 
      • where do we want to populate from in other cases?
    • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

    • Release Target: 
    • Development Estimate

    Sprint 184

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3063
    (error) Owen Stephens

    Status
    subtletrue
    colourYellow
    titleQA

    Deferred to BugFest environment setup (week of 25-29 Mar)

    Sprint 177
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3133
    (tick) Owen Stephens
    Status
    subtletrue
    colourYellow
    titleQA
    Sprint 182
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-2981
    (tick) Owen Stephens
    Status
    subtletrue
    colourYellow
    titleQA
    Sprint 183
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3041
    (error) Claudia Malzer

    Deferred to Sprint 186. No progress expected. Dev on vacation until Sprint 186. 

    • Approach

    • Components and Changes
      • Frontend: stripes-erm-components

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

      • new unit test to set up form and presents close as expected
    • Known Unknowns: NA
    • QA: snapshot 

    • Release Target: Quesnelia 
    • Development Estimate: <2d

    Sprint 183
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3130
    (tick) Monireh Rasouli

    Issues with frontend delaying start.

    Cannot see changes on the frontend. 

    Sprint 182
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-
    3132
    (tick) Jack Golding
    • Triage

      • needs some investigation work
      • priority is for GOKb
    • Approach
    • Components and Changes

    • Known Unknowns

      • how do we want to track (count) the external (remote) counts? 
        • In the XML for the package rather than database
        • once the package XML is in hand, count all TIPPs with status=current 
      • where do we want to populate from in other cases?
    • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

    • Release Target: 
    • Development Estimate

    Sprint 184

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3063
    (error) Owen Stephens

    Status
    subtletrue
    colourYellow
    titleQA

    Deferred to BugFest environment setup (week of 25-29 Mar)

    Sprint 177

    Status
    subtletrue
    colourGreen
    titleIn Progress

    • Triage

      • is this the kind of issue that pr707 is meant to have fixed?
      • review log file against pr707 zombie job
      • check that jobs are not stuck, just queued?
    • Approach: subject to investigation findings
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend

      • Backend

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies: NA

    • Known Unknowns: check with GBV if restarting mod-agreements is viable workaround

    • QA: NA

    • Release Target: Quesnalia 
      • not expecting to backport, as restart may be viable workaround
    • Development Estimate

     

    • Issues tracking this back to federation service
    • Need to revisit the pulse after zombie job changes
    Sprint 183
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-31333140
    (tick) Owen StephensJack Golding

    Status
    subtletrue
    colour

    Yellow

    Green
    title

    QASprint 182
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-2981
    (tick) Owen Stephens
    Status
    subtletrue
    colourYellow
    titleQA
    Sprint 183
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3041
    (error) Claudia Malzer

    Deferred to Sprint 186. No progress expected. Dev on vacation until Sprint 186. 

    • Approach

    • Components and Changes
      • Frontend: stripes-erm-components

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

      • new unit test to set up form and presents close as expected
    • Known Unknowns: NA
    • QA: snapshot 

    • Release Target: Quesnelia 
    • Development Estimate: <2d

    Sprint 183

    In Progress

     

    • Does title count need to be fetched also?
      • NO see ERM-3141
      • BUT test that it is fillable with a dummy number
    • Does this need to be Nullable? YES 
    • Update integration tests: glob this to related package schema tests
    • Then ready for Code Review
    Sprint 184

    Ethan Freestone

    Optimisation on ingest

    • Triage

    • Approach
      • Review which queries are affected to confirm that the branch is correct and complete
      • All ingest queries on branch are changed, but need to be refactored
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend

      • Backend

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

    • Known Unknowns

    • QA: snapshot | local | testing | other

    • Release Target: 
    • Development Estimate


    Performance fixesEthan Freestone

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3148

    •  
      • Bug: clean up situation where log error causes downstream null pointer exception 
      • clean up for query optimisation 
      • title rename

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-

    3130
    (tick) Monireh Rasouli

    Issues with frontend delaying start.

    Cannot see changes on the frontend. 

    Sprint 182

    3151

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    key

    ERM-3132(tick) Jack Golding

    Status
    subtletrue
    colourGreen
    titleIn Progress

  • Triage

    • is this the kind of issue that pr707 is meant to have fixed?
    • review log file against pr707 zombie job
    • check that jobs are not stuck, just queued?
  • Approach: subject to investigation findings

    ERM-3153

    • Triage

    • Approach
      • revert locked changes and add fallback (ERM-3151) 
      • add query (ERM-3148)
      • investigate triplicate error message
      • remove the match key modelling (ERM-3153)
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend

      • Backend

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

    • Known Unknowns

    check with GBV if restarting mod-agreements is viable workaround
    • QA:

    snapshot | local | testing | other
    •  

      • harvesting on snapshot and snapshot-2
      • initially all on live. then review 
    • Release Target:
    Quesnalia not expecting to backport, as restart may be viable workaround
    • Quesnalia
    • Development Estimate


    Sprint 183
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-31403149
    (tick)(question) Jack GoldingOwen Stephens

    Status
    subtletrue
    colour

    Green

    Optimisation on ingest

    Yellow
    title

    In ProgressSprint 184Ethan Freestone

    NEEDS UI

    Needs mockup

    Ethan Freestone
    • Triage

    • Approach
    • Review which queries are affected to confirm that the branch is correct and complete
    • All ingest queries on branch are changed, but need to be refactored
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend: ui-agreements

      • Backend: NA

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

    • Known Unknowns

    • QA: snapshot | local | testing | othersnapshot 

    • Release Target:  Quesnalia
    • Development Estimate

    Performance fixes
    • Estimate


    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    key
    ERM-3148
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3151

    ERM-3150
    (question) Owen Stephens

    Status
    subtletrue
    colourYellow
    titleNEEDS ANALYSIS

    • Triage

      • Query is slow because it has to count all resources every time we display agreement line, which is every time we display agreement
      • May also affect title lookup 
    • Approach
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend: NA

      • Backend: mod-agreements

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

    • Known Unknowns

    • QA: snapshot

    • Release Target: Quesnalia
    • Development Estimate 


    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    key
    ERM-3153
  • Triage

  • Approach
  • revert locked changes and add fallback (ERM-3151) 
  • add query (ERM-3148)
  • investigate triplicate error message
  • remove the match key modelling (ERM-3153
    ERM-3152
    Ethan Freestone
    • Triage

    • Approach
      • Extends the work on marking a job as interrupted
      • Closes loop on job interruption to mark data source as released ("idle")
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend: NA

      • Backend: mod-agreements

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies: NA

    • Known Unknowns

      QA: 

    • harvesting on snapshot and snapshot-2
    • initially all on live. then review 

      : NA

    • QA: dev

    • Release Target: Quesnalia Quesnalia
    • Development Estimate: Wed

     Closed as tested by dev. Not reproduceable for QA.



    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3149
    (question) Owen Stephens
    3142
    NA

    Status
    subtletrue
    colourYellow
    titleNEEDS UI

    Needs mockup

  • Triage

  • Approach
  • Components and Changes

    • Frontend: ui-agreements

    • Backend: NA

  • Tests / Data / Dependencies

  • Known Unknowns

  • QA: snapshot 

  • Release Target: Quesnalia
  • Development Estimate

    Blue
    titleAWAITING DEPLOYMENT

    Fixed by 

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    key

    ERM

    STCOM-

    3150(question) Owen Stephens

    Status
    subtletrue
    colourYellow
    titleNEEDS ANALYSIS

    • Triage

      • Query is slow because it has to count all resources every time we display agreement line, which is every time we display agreement
      • May also affect title lookup 
    • Approach
    • Components and Changes

      • Frontend: NA

      • Backend: mod-agreements

    • Tests / Data / Dependencies

    • Known Unknowns

    • QA: snapshot

    • Release Target: Quesnalia
    • Development Estimate 

    1262

    Pending release of STCOM


    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3124

    Moved to QA for review
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-31523155
    Ethan Freestone

  • Triage

  • Approach
    • Extends the work on marking a job as interrupted
    • Closes loop on job interruption to mark data source as released ("idle")
  • Components and Changes

    • Frontend: NA

    • Backend: mod-agreements

  • Tests / Data / Dependencies

  • Known Unknowns

  • QA: snapshot 

  • Release Target: Quesnalia
  • Development Estimate
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyERM-3154
    (plus) Ethan FreestoneCan be backported

    Tests

    (minus) Cypress test development stalled pending implementation of

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keySTCOR-484

    Issue ID

    Sprint Backlog?

    Notes / Estimates / Actions





    Release Tasks (
    Non-Flower Release)

    Issue ID

    Sprint Backlog?

    Notes / Estimates / Actions




    Release Tasks (Orchid CSP)

    Issue ID

    Sprint Backlog?

    Notes / Estimates / Actions

    NA

    Release Tasks (Poppy Bug Fix)

    Issue ID

    Sprint Backlog?

    Notes / Estimates / Actions

    NA



    Maintenance

    Issue ID

    Sprint Backlog?

    Notes / Estimates / Actions

    NA





    Changes

    (plus) Added

    (minus) Removed: note whether rescheduled or deferred

    Feature ID

    Issue ID

    Change

    Notes


    Add column select functionality to selected MCL cases

    (question)

    Example: ui-orders

    Approach: 

    1. investigate whether native stripes component integrates cleanly and easily with ERM applications
    2. apply stripes or bespoke component to selected MCLs







    Sprint Summary

    ERM


    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    columnIdsissuekey,summary,issuetype,assignee,status,components
    columnskey,summary,type,assignee,status,components
    maximumIssues20
    jqlQuerylabels != release and labels in (licenses, agreements, erm) and Sprint = 2104 and issuetype in standardIssueTypes()
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc

    Dashboard

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    columnIdsissuekey,summary,issuetype,assignee,status,components
    columnskey,summary,type,assignee,status,components
    maximumIssues20
    jqlQuerylabels = dashboard and Sprint = 2104
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc

    Other

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    columnIdsissuekey,summary,issuetype,assignee,status,components,labels
    columnskey,summary,type,assignee,status,components,labels
    maximumIssues20
    jqlQuery(labels = release or labels not in (licenses, agreements, erm, dashboard)) and Sprint = 2104
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc

    No Label

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    columnIdsissuekey,summary,issuetype,assignee,status,components
    columnskey,summary,type,assignee,status,components
    maximumIssues20
    jqlQuerylabels is empty and Sprint = 2104
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc