Issues

Select view

Select search mode

 
16 of 16

SRS MARC Query API part 2

Done

Description

This feature holds the story for more advanced MARC queries split into R2 or R3.

 

Current situation or problem:
Given FOLIO doesn't yet support searching of MARC records in source record storage (SRS), this feature would provide an API that FOLIO implementers could use to query MARC. The API could be used for a variety of different purposes, such as identifying records for export, updates, and clean up. It could also, eventually, be used to support UI(s) for searching MARC within FOLIO, but that UI is out of scope for this feature. This feature will NOT use elastic search, implementation details to come.

In scope

Allow for search based on the presence or absence of a field, subfield, indicator, or fixed field position
Allow for date range search based on dates present in a subfield
Allow consumers to search new and/or local MARC tags and have them indexed appropriately

Out of scope
A search UI for MARC data
Searching inventory data

Use case(s)
Searching MARC data in order to identify records for data export
Searching MARC data in order to match records to be updated with data import
Searching MARC data as part of ETL clean up processes that libraries run to main data quality
Searching MARC data to identify records in cases where only examination of the MARC allows accurate selection of records

Priority

Fix versions

Development Team

Spitfire

Assignee

Solution Architect

Parent Field Value

None

Parent Status

None

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Details

Reporter

Estimation Notes and Assumptions

More advanced search functionality split from the R1 issue. Edge module functionality has been split to UXPROD-2916.

Score

8

Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021)

R2

Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021)

R1

Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021)

R1

Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020)

R2

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs
Created March 8, 2021 at 11:59 AM
Updated October 8, 2021 at 9:38 AM
Resolved May 19, 2021 at 9:50 AM

Activity

Show:

Jenn Colt May 12, 2021 at 11:10 PM

Hi no, I was thinking of the migration script. Maybe I'm being overly anxious about it. If the meeting we've had to postpone a couple of times has a good result tomorrow, I can remove it.

Khalilah Gambrell May 12, 2021 at 11:04 PM

, is the labeling of this feature as At-Risk tied to the unknowns regarding MARC Authority records?

TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
Loading...