Instance Record. Accordion Electronic access. Implement new elements and reorder data - part 1

CSP Request Details

None

CSP Rejection Details

None

CSP Approved

None

Description

Purpose: To re-order and extend the metadata in Inventory Instance record, the accordion Electronic access collected in accordance with the Metadata Management SIG discussions and the GAPS analysis done by the Data Migration Subgroup, which are captured in

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Inventory Beta - Metadata Elements, column I (Electronic access)

  • Fields where Jira Story UIIN-229, column B are in scope for this story

  • Elements with a check mark in column C is implemented for alpha, or later updates

  • Create, view, edit and clone mode of the instance record all need to be updated

  • The UI display should look like the attached UX wireframes

  • Metadata elements labels should be as shown in column A "Instance Metadata Elements" column (please pay attention to the label case

  • Form edit controls (and values, where applicable) are specified in the "Input Type" column

  • Repeatable fields are indicated in column G "Repeatable"

  • Required fields are indicated in column H "Required" - include asterisks where noted (these denote that the field is required)

  • Please note, some of these have input controls that will ensure they are populated (when records are created via the UI). Others will require a validation message if left blank but that is out of scope for this story

  • All other columns in the Inventory Beta - Metadata Elements (tab: Instance Metadata for Inventory) spreadsheet can be ignored

Environment

None

Potential Workaround

None

Attachments

3

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Activity

Show:

Charlotte Whitt September 21, 2018 at 11:50 AM

Hi - I have updated following sample records with electronic access descriptions, and deprecated the former url-element:

  • biometrics-and-neuroscience.json

  • global-africa-v1.json

  • global-africa-v3.json

  • umzetzung-v1.json

  • umzetzung-v2.json

  • bridget-jones-baby.json

Niels Erik Nielsen September 13, 2018 at 3:56 PM

Property

In detail view

In edit form

Missing parts (Q4/part 2 if not done today)

Other comments

Electronic access (group of fields)

Q3, very rough display

Q3

Turns out 'relationship' will be a select list (see comment above), that bit will be part 2. The display of electronic access in detail view to be refined (part 2)

 

Charlotte Whitt September 13, 2018 at 11:52 AM

- sounds all good. Thanks

Niels Erik Nielsen September 13, 2018 at 9:03 AM
Edited

, this is the Q3 and part 2 designations for this issue, may change during the day (add to detail page) if time permits:

Property

In detail view

In edit form

Missing parts (Q4/part 2 if not done today)

Other comments

Electronic access (group of fields)

Part 2

Q3

Turns out 'relationship' will be a select list (see comment above), that bit will be part 2

 

Niels Erik Nielsen September 12, 2018 at 10:01 PM
Edited

Actually the relationship will be a select list. Options provided by Laura Wright just now:

It's based on the value of the 856 2nd indicator. The possible values are

  1. - No information provided
    0 - Resource
    1 - Version of resource
    2 - Related resource
    8 - No display constant generated

In other words one more reference table - to be implemented as per spreadsheet (simple text field) for Q3, as select list later.

Done

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Priority

Development Team

Other dev

Fix versions

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs
Created July 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM
Updated November 3, 2023 at 2:55 PM
Resolved September 13, 2018 at 4:13 PM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs