Skip to:

  1. Skip to Jira Navigation
  2. Skip to Side Navigation
  3. Skip to Main Content

Update ReOpen order logic with holding ids storing

CSP Request Details

None

CSP Rejection Details

None

CSP Approved

Description

Purpose/Overview:
In order to support

In the Acquisition accordion for the holding need to show order details information

Requirements/Scope:

Update open order logic with holding ids storing

 

Use Cases:

 

Approach:

org.folio.helper.PurchaseOrderHelper#updateOrder

Acceptance criteria:

  • Logic updated

  • Unit tests

  • API Tests updated or created

Environment

None

Potential Workaround

None

Attachments

2

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Activity

Show:

Andrei Makaranka June 3, 2021 at 11:22 AM

After final clarification and testing can be closed as is< without code changes.
Functionality tested by API tests https://github.com/folio-org/folio-integration-tests/tree/feature/UXPROD-1925

Dennis Bridges May 28, 2021 at 1:06 PM

 Yes you're right. We may need to consider this situation during migration. To make sure all orders of this type that have pieces are synced between order and receiving. However, if the user must edit from receiving we should not need to worry about these quantities when "Reopening" the order.

Andrei Makaranka May 28, 2021 at 12:33 PM
Edited

Hi

I have some questions could you please confirm :
1. ReOpen order happens in two situation:
Open -> Close -> Open
Open -> Pending -> Open

2. We should block editing POL location quantity after:
Pending -> Open (workflowStatus is "Open")
Open -> Close (workflowStatus is "Closed")
Open -> Pending (workflowStatus is "Pending")
If yes, then highlighted in yellow doesn't make sense,  because POL quantity changing will be happened from receiving App?

Thanks you in advance

Won't Do

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Priority

Story Points

Sprint

Development Team

Parent

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs

Created May 12, 2021 at 7:33 AM
Updated June 3, 2021 at 11:22 AM
Resolved June 3, 2021 at 11:22 AM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs