Wrong location used to determine fee/fine owner for items aged to lost

Description

Overview:
For items that are lost, the fee/fine owner of the lost fee(s) should be the location that "owns" the item. In https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/CIRC-852#icft=CIRC-852 (charging aged to lost fees), Holly erroneously identified this location as Holdings location: Permanent, when it should have been Item location: Permanent. The developer used Effective location for item, which is what we use for overdue fines, but not for lost item fees.

Important Note:

  • Use Item location: Permanent :check_mark:

  • If Item location: Permanent does not exist, use Holdings location: Permanent :check_mark:

  • If Holdings location: Permanent does not exist, use Effective location for item

(We need to associate this to some Fee/fine owner!)

See related bug CIRC-920 for more details.

CSP Request Details

None

CSP Rejection Details

None

Potential Workaround

None

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Activity

Show:

Emma BoettcherOctober 2, 2020 at 7:56 PM

Tested on folio-snapshot as diku_admin

Holly MistlebauerOctober 2, 2020 at 2:44 PM

will be testing this on SNAPSHOT instead of Holly.

Bohdan SuprunSeptember 21, 2020 at 9:12 AM

Hi ,

The fix has been merged to master, will be available for verification after redeploy.

Done

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Tester Assignee

Labels

Priority

Story Points

Sprint

Development Team

Prokopovych

Fix versions

Release

Q3 2020

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs

Created September 10, 2020 at 5:45 PM
Updated October 2, 2020 at 7:56 PM
Resolved October 2, 2020 at 7:56 PM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs

Flag notifications