Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

Bug Fest Q1 2020 Report

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Summary

We run full regression test during Q4 Bug Fest. 89% of the test cases has been marked as PASSED. It is 12% higher compare to Bug Fest 3.2. Also, we had a record test case count of 689. Q4 release was delayed due to P1 and P2 defects that were found during Bug Fest. That being said, the Testing Community did a great job of finding blocking bugs and prevented them slipping into the release. We expect Q4 release to be finalized in the fist half of January.

Bug Fest notes:

  • We had fewer testers to participate in this  Bug Fest: 39 vs 43
  • Testing community has been a great help again! 31 testers from different institutions helped us to complete this test cycle.
  • It was much better executed test cycle compare to Q3.2:
    • Not executed 1 vs 33 
    • Blocked 4 vs 12
    • Retest 8 vs 40
    • Failed 66 vs 50
    • Passed 610 vs 464
    • Total 689 vs 599
  • Prior to the test run, small team of testers worked to create descriptions and steps for 425 test cases. Many thanks to everyone who contributed:
    • Ann-Marie Breaux
    • Anton Emelianov
    • Cate Boerema
    • Catherine Smith
    • Charlotte Whitt
    • Cheryl Malmborg
    • Colin Van Alstine
    • Cornelia Awenius
    • Darcy Branchini
    • Dennis Bridges
    • Emma Boettcher
    • Holly Mistlebauer
    • Jana Freytag
    • Jennifer Eustis
    • Khalilah Gambrell
    • Martin Spenger
    • Patricia Wanninger
    • Peter Duschner
    • Stefanie Sußmann
  • There is a positive trend in terms of balancing test case between Testing Community Members and Folio Staff:
    • Community members executed more test cases in Q4 vs Q3.2: 545 vs 395
    • Folio staff executed less test cases in Q4 vs Q3.2: 137 vs 180
  • We had several environment issues related to data migration and configuration of the reference data.
  • Overall, system performance was good. However it suffered due to the fact that some table indexes were missing during data migration.

Individual Participation:

Participation by Institution:



Highlights of the results:

  • 70 defects has been logged.
  • 13 defects has been closed as "duplicate", "cannot reproduce", or "won't do". It is much lower percentage compare to previous BugFest Q3.2.
  • Defects were created by 24 different participants.
  • Holly Mistlebauer is the Bug Fest Champion with 18 submitted defects.
  • Testers logged the most number for defects against ui-users (25).
  • ui-inventory and  mod-inventory-storage did much better this time. Only 4 defects has been filed.
  • ui-orders (5), ui-finance (6), and  ui-organizations (5) received the highest defect count. 
  • All 7 P1 defects were addressed before release. 
  • There were 21 P2 defects. 18 of them has been fixed. The rest has been assigned to the future releases.
  • Link to the live JIRA dashboard is here.
  • Q4 release was delayed due to time needed to fix defects that were found during Bug Fest Q4.




  • No labels