Date
Attendees
Recordings
Recordings of meetings can be found in the Metadata_Management_SIG > Recordings folder on AWS from 2022 onwards: https://recordings.openlibraryfoundation.org/folio/metadata-management-sig/
Discussion items
Notetaker | Laura E Daniels | |
Announcements | Information and question from Marc Johnson in Slack:
Please get in touch with Marc ASAP if your institution relies on these features. Charlotte: we have not even begun to support other formats (other than MARC) –but this has always been the intention. Why not keep these features? Jenn (chat): it sounds like a maintenance issue Christie (chat): are they even usable in their current form? Jacquie: sounds like these would not even work anyway? Action: Charlotte will reach out to Marc: are they usable at all in current form? | |
PC update | reviewed status of SIGs & working groups (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hr7Vx-swyCGfQ3571AK8nYx2MMWb1VFoaqrCYOPE8mM/edit#gid=0) Please add meeting times as needed to the spreadsheet (e.g., quickMARC) | |
MM SIG Release Note & Other Highlights Of note: Bug in current LDP MARC 1.5 – temporary fix was applied in 1.51
Need volunteers to help test/verify 2 bugs:
(Felix, Jacquie, Jennifer E., and Laura volunteered – Charlotte will set up a Slack channel and possibly meeting time) | ||
Entity Management in FOLIO | WOLFcon session summary https://wolfcon2022.sched.com/event/14APp/entity-management-in-folio-next-steps Vision statement from working group Next steps 1) Refining vision, how to leverage current work around MARC authorities in FOLIO 2) What are resource implications for creation of functionality around entity management? Summary of WolfCon discussion: Khalilah outlined current development Tiziana shared info about Share VDE Proof of concept developed around Sinopia-FOLIO integration Questioning authorities tool There is a lot of broad interest in this within the community; what are the practicalities of getting work done toward this now that there are more live libraries and unmet needs Where should a working group start? Request: Form New Entity Management Working Group – not necessarily same group as before, should be cross-section of the community Entity Management Epic in JIRA:
-
ROAD-124Getting issue details...
STATUS
Charlotte suggests starting with an environmental scan: what has happened in the project since the last working group ended. We also need: a convener, a PO, development resources Jason offered to convene. Lots of plus ones to this. Thank you, Jason! Felix offered every other week's MM time for this group to meet. Christie: suggests forming subgroups to investigate different approaches from a practical perspective Steven: supports idea of concurrent work, including polling community to prioritize first steps Charlotte: ARLEF might be interested in entity management? Jason: what does membership look like? Jenn: open broader discussions to help identify/self-select subgroups would be helpful Christie: these conversations might need to be broader than MM SIG Nancy: how do we make sure subgroup work meshes well together? needs to be some central organization; +1 from Jacquie Jason acknowledged this concern October 6 MM meeting time will be devoted to the first Entity Management Working Group discussion Jason will send out calls for participation across FOLIO community Christie: interested in helping structure the conversation so that we can come out with priorities Anyone else who would like to help form the agenda, contact Jason in Slack – will organize planning meeting before Oct 6 Entity Management Slack channel: #entity-management-wg | |
Search: HRID and UUID for keyword search? | Charlotte Whitt |
|