Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2024-10-15 Discovery working group

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Current »

At Meeting

NameAssociation
Marie WidigsonChalmers
Demian KatzVillanova University
Bernd OberknappFreiburg University Library
Tammy WolfEBSCO
Nicole TrujilloCU Boulder
Cory LownStanford
Johanna Radding5 colleges

2024 Discovery API Improvements 

Minutes

  • WolfCon 2024 
    • Follow up themes/answers to our questions
      • Suggested to join Linked Data, discovery should be discussed more there
        • Somebody from the group could report back?
      • Aspen discovery, will that be integrated with FOLIO? Nobody using Aspen/FOLIO yet that we know.
      • New survey?
        • Not duplicating the survey anytime soon since we still need to work on the findings.
        • We could do a new survey if the community had a specific question.
      • ERM licenses for e-Resources, how can they show in discovery?
        • KB collections vs instances for e-Resources
          • Different people put license information in different places (aka MARC fields/506 vs FOLIO license fields)
            • Catalog Records
            • Discovery Index Records
          • Do a Prototype for instance with attached license terms using soft order linking?
            • Need info/diagram of how these connect
            • Link Resolver proof of concept
        • What are the issues with e-Resource management in FOLIO?
          • Is this part of our group's topic? 
            • ERM subgroups: eHoldings 
            • How to link instance to agreement (thus for licenses)
      • Volume/issue/enumeration, is that solved?
        • EBSCO is working on solving it
        • Still needs to be resolved
      • New edge RTAC solution needed
        • Very positive received from this presentation.
        • Question: how can we work towards this?
          • Working on prototype/proof on concept for RTAC solution, discussed with both EBSCO/VuFind
  • Are we a SIG? Should we submit to monthly SIG report? - moved to next meeting
  • Any additional steps for listed improvements? - moved to next meeting
    • EDS - Customize column labels
      • We would love a set of pre-determined label options: Like Shelf mark vs Call number, Status vs Availability, Holdings info vs Holdings statement, etc. Anyone care to provide comment and suggestions?
        • Current: Status: | Due date: | Loan Type: | Location: | Call Number:
    • I added a few more Jira tickets, including MODINVSTOR-1266


Next meeting

Meetings on Tuesday at 10:00 am EST, dates TBD by #discovery Slack channel and posted here.



  • No labels