Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 8
Next »
Attendees
Discussion items
Minute taker | |
|
| | - Voting for Community council: open to all registered wiki/slack users
- WolfCon (June 1-3)
- Roadmap being tweaked to be for adaptable to the future
- Possible new ranking process coming
- not sure about rollout or timeframe
|
UXPROD-2373
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
Allow for the display of piece information on Holding records in inventory | | - Display of Piece Info on Holding records (in Inventory)
-
UXPROD-2373
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
- example focused on enumeration and chronology
- There is a 'display on holdings' toggle in the receiving are
- also a 'suppress from discovery'
- can choose a location selection to pick a new holding for a piece if needs be
- from chat (Will there be a default holdings to which the PO is attached? )
- Possible conflict about 2 features about displaying holdings in receiving
- from chat (Question: to clarify what I am seeing: Should we be putting Volume 1 rather than just 1 in the Enumeration field? )
- Setting up a default for receive locations for a title
- Maybe should expose the location in the POL in receiving if that default needed to be chaned
- from chat (Virginia, it is tentatively given a location, but made 'official' by the cataloger? local workflow? // Answer: yes, and it's just info that resides on the order and we ignore forever after (at Duke))
- Some have started using subscriptions records because it allows some ease of use in some things (In Aleph)
- There is a publication pattern functionality as part of this process
- From chat (What’s the purpose of the Enumeration field? )
- Enumeration data can point to the item level (important for the public)
- helpful to the machine
- What about keeping the caption field, but adding the enumeration and chronology fields?
- So, in inventory, enumeration and chronology can be seen in the receiving history
- from chat (Owen S) (I think MARC holdings supports 6 levels of enumeration and four levels of chronology )
- say: season, year on chronology side / volume, issue on the enumeration side (4 pieces of side that relate to the item in a serial holdings record)
- from chat (The MARC approach is complex (natch) but it’s designed to allow for a lot of real world variance )
- from chat (in 855 MARC use the following subfields: Subfield Codes Enumeration caption: $a - First level of enumeration (NR) $b - Second level of enumeration (NR) $c - Third level of enumeration (NR) $d - Fourth level of enumeration (NR) $e - Fifth level of enumeration (NR) $f - Sixth level of enumeration (NR) $g - Alternative numbering scheme, first level of enumeration (NR) $h - Alternative numbering scheme, second level of enumeration (NR) Chronology caption: $i - First level of chronology (NR) $j - Second level of chronology (NR) $k - Third level of chronology (NR) $l - Fourth level of chronology (NR) $m - Alternative numbering scheme, chronology (NR) )
- Question from chat (Why not follow the MARC standard? )
- from chat (I think that there has been some debate or back and forth on the MM SIG about supporting MARC holdings in FOLIO / not sure where that landed)
- from chat (this is a good example: 853 22$81$av.$bno.$u4$vr$i(year)$j(season)$wq$x22 863 41$81.1$a3$b1$i1944$j22 )
- from chat (I think MARC is a good source for understanding the complexity - I just don’t know if we want to just tie our implementation to MARC )
- from chat (at this point I am hoping to just better understand what those fields mean and do ... as in FOLIO / What is Enum, what is Chron, what is Volume on the Item screen ... and what do they do )
- from chat (the problem is the editors who sometimes use volume, other times numbering, whatever they want to invent as numeric and chronological )
- We want to make sure that info captured in receiving in represented in Inventory
- Dennis will work on one more update to the piece layout
- By default, the FOLIO displays in discovery at receipt (and is not suppressed)
- Also, displaying in receiving history accordion on the holdings record
- Dennis says to add comments on the wikipage or on the JIRA issue noted in the left column
- from chat (We would not create item records in Inventory for issues that are received as parts in Receiving, but have items for the bound volume) (Same for UChicago)
- need some way to browse the received items
- can search receiving for titles and see those items received associated
|
| | |
UXPROD-2893
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
Print/save order and order lines as PDF | |
|
Action items