Feedback on the sprint reviews should be given either to Dracine or to the product owners.
The Product Council has been talking about testing. Testing is being done mostly at EBSCO at the moment. They may decide at the Madrid meeting to have a dedicated tester.
They also discussed a regeneration of the Privacy SIG and Sys Ops and Management SIG. They have identified a convener for the Privacy SIG.
In May there will probably be a gathering of those interested in FOLIO.
The Linked Data group will be a working group of the MM SIG. Linked data is a topic on the agenda at Madrid. This may help give the group a purpose or direction.
Forum facilitators update / linked data WG update / any other announcements
Michael Winkler reported on the API forum. About 30 people attended for the approx. 30 minute meeting. Presenters were together in same room. They have had no specific feedback about the forum itself.
Lynn will send out a Doodle poll for meeting dates/times next week - aiming to have first working group meeting the week of Jan 29th
Some people from the Resource Management SIG will join the working group.
The first meeting may be the end of January, or start of Feb.
There was short discussion of what the role of 33X fields in formatting will be. They will be considered, but as a member pointed out, we do have to consider legacy data since many libraries do not have a workflow or process to upgrade exisiting records. If anyone has mappings to offer, even if they cannot join the working group, please feel free to share that.
In chat from Lisa @TAMU - "
Back burner: while you are considering this, don't forget folks who have multiple formats on one bib, so there could be 007s etc. on print records where the e-version is also noted on the print version."
share the time between Inventory, Codex Search AND the Cataloguing app. And how we plan to have several small working groups in parallel, in order to be able to work on several areas at the same time.
We'll meet with AtCult in early Feb(?) to discuss the microservices to include in an initial editing/cataloging workflow
We'll meet with Sebastian H. sometime in Feb to discuss the data model for transferring data between the record warehouse(s) / catalog editor / inventory / codex
Lynn said that as AtCult's development moves, they will ask for feedback from this group.
After Madrid, Philip will come back to our group with some UX work on inventory.
Charlotte stated that AtCult's starting point is typically written workflows, which is different than the approach we have been taking with FOLIO. Cate said they will try to merge both approaches so we can continue to think about the UX as we work.
There will be a breakout discussion session at the Madrid developers meeting: "Cataloguing by reference: Authority data control and Linked data - - discuss if authority control is a step on the path to linked data"; what questions/ideas/thoughts need to be brought forward for discussion?
Joint RM & MM SIG meeting 2/2
group vote
RM SIG meeting on 2/2 (8:30am EST): Khalilah is planning to do a demo of the eHolding app, and Charlotte will follow up with a demo of the Codex Search. Maybe this would be relevant for the MM-SIG as well. We could do the two demos at both the MM-SIG and the RM-SIG meetings or do a joint RM and MM-SIG meeting?