Date
Recordings
Find all recordings here: https://recordings.openlibraryfoundation.org/folio/resource-access-sig/ (pw: folio-lsp)
Zoom
https://zoom.us/j/337279319 (pw: folio-lsp)
Attendees
Cornelia Awenius Christine Tobias Cheryl Malmborg Amelia Sutton Charlotte Whitt David Bottorff Dwayne Swigert Kara HartErin WellerKaren White Laurence Minilisa perchermeierMagnus AnderssonOlgaPetra SchneiderTara BarnettTobi HinesCatherine TuohyKimie Kester
Discussion Items:
Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals/Info/notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5Min | Administrivia | Next Meetings Meeting times | Note taker: Catherine Tuohy No meeting on Monday, February 19 (Presidents Day - US) Thursday, February 8 is joint meeting with Metadata Management SIG - starts at 11:30am. | |
10Min | New Gap List Working Meeting - Planning | all | ||
45Min | all | Continuation of Gap List topic Request Anonymization |
|
Meeting Notes
notes from January:
summary of loan anonymization
what we have:
on demand from a specific user record, not possible for loans with related fees/fines
through settings after a certain period, with different options for loans with related fees/fines and possible exceptions per payment method
patron name and barcode are removed from the loan, patron group at check out is retained
item search in the circ log shows loan actions without user information
what we don't have:
retaining patron custom fields and department field
request anonymization
we are not talking about:
removing patron information from open requests
workflows for confidential requests that should not show patron information at all
are there any workarounds?
the only one would be deleting closed requests, Swedish libraries are keeping them right now
open questions:
Do we need different settings for the four different closed requests statuses?
the group could see use cases for that, but could live without, most don't have access to closed requests in current/former systems
How to handle bulk anonymization?
should be talked over with Bulk edit group, automated anonymization would be more important for European libraries
Should anonoymization be possible for specific requests or for a list of search results?
to be discussed in connection with bulk actions
What patron information to retain (patron group, department, custom fields)?
to be discussed next time, suggestion: should be handled the same way as loan anonymization
How should anonymized requests show up in the circ log?
to be discussed next time
Should anonymized requests still be displayed when searching/filtering the request app, just without patron information?
to be discussed next time