Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

Review Process: Submit a Review for Product Council

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Overview

This document outlines the processes for product evaluation of new functionality for inclusion in a FOLIO release. The following activities are covered:

  1. Before Development

  2. Submission

  3. Evaluation

  4. Review

  5. Feedback

  6. Approval/Rejected

Before Development

  • Please review the Evaluation Process for new FOLIO Functionality and Frequently Asked Questions before (or as early as possible during) development.

  • The Product Council welcomes questions. In particular, if you anticipate that the functionality will introduce any cross-app changes or other innovations that might conflict with existing functionality, please do reach out to the Product Council ASAP.

Submit a Review Using JIRA

  1. The Submitter fills out a form in JIRA (using a template) and submits it to the PCR Board for review.

    • See JIRA workflow for details.

    • An Evaluator will only respond to submissions from the official Submitter as defined in the 'Roles' section of this document. The JIRA ticket is set to SUBMITTED.

JIRA Template To Be Answered For the Product Council

The Template will includes these prompts. The Submitter should provides answers to and documentation for the following criteria:

  • Functionality Name

  • Functionality Description

  • Desired release date

  • Expected TC review period

  • Describe how this functionality is unique

  • Describe how this functionality impacts or compliments existing functionality

  • Describe how this functionality fits into the roadmap

  • High level description of how the functionality is being built (back and front end aspects, interactions with existing functionality, etc.)

  • Describe any dependencies

  • Describe your user acceptance test plans

  • Links to documentation (technical and users) or describe documentation plans

  • Link(s) to presentation materials

Review

  1. The Evaluator sets the JIRA issue from SUBMITTED to REVIEW.

  2. The Evaluator will update the JIRA within 1 week (See JIRA workflow for details) with the following information:

    • Confirm receipt of the submission

    • Request additional information such as a presentation of the what the new functionality

    • Request a demonstration of the module

      • The Evaluator will contact the Submitter with a request for a demonstration, and a mutually suitable time for the demonstration will be scheduled.

  3. The Evaluator will work collaboratively with the Submitted to ensure all criteria has been answered in the JIRA issue and that the submission is set up for a successful review.

  4. Timeline: JIRA issues needs to pass to the next step within one week after submission. If that deadline falls on a holiday or weekend, then the week deadline is the next business day.

Endorsement

  1. The Submitter presents at the schedule time to the Product Council.

    1. This presentation is a time for Product Council members to become familiar with the new functionality, understand how it works, and how it impacts current functionality. Product Council members can also review the recording and materials asynchronously.

    2. The Product Council members will strive to see how this new functionality fits into FOLIO as a whole and as an international product.

  2. The Product Council decides, using its standard protocols, to accept, accept with a follow-up, or reject the new functionality under review within 2 weeks after the presentation. The following statuses can be assigned:

    1. An evaluation where all criteria are met will typically result in the Product Council’s Endorsement of the new functionality.

      1. The JIRA issue transitions from UNDER REVIEW to APPROVED.

    2. An evaluation where some criteria are met will typically result in an accept with a follow-up:

      1. Because Product Council reviews should occur early in the development process, not all intersections might have been seen before the review. A follow-up allows the Product Council to reach out to additional stakeholders and work collaboratively with the Submitter on questions that arose during the review.

      2. The JIRA issue transitions from UNDER REVIEW to APPROVED WITH FOLLOW-UP

    3. An evaluation where none of the criteria even after the presentation are met will typically result in a status of cancelled, blocked, or deferred. The Product Council will work with the Submitter to understand how to ensure all criteria are met and which status is appropriate.

      1. The JIRA issue transitions from UNDER REVIEW to CANCELLED, BLOCKED, or DEFERRED.

  3. Timeline: JIRA issues needs to pass to the next step within two weeks after submission. If that deadline falls on a holiday or weekend, then the week deadline is the next business day.

Documenting Endorsements

  • Endorsement results are published in the Functionality Evaluated by the Product Council within 2 weeks after a endorsement is made.

  • Interested parties (e.g. release coordinator, contributor points of contact, Product Council members, SIG convenors) are notified, and provided a link to the results.

  • Timeline: Documentation and communication occurs within two weeks after submission. If that deadline falls on a holiday or weekend, then the week deadline is the next business day.

Follow-Up Status

  • If there is a follow-up, the Evaluator will contact the Submitter, and a mutually suitable time for the follow-up will be scheduled.

    • For a follow-up, the Jira Issue is transitioned from APPROVED WITH FOLLOW-UP to REVIEW.

  • Timeline: JIRA issues needs to pass to the next step within two weeks after submission. If that deadline falls on a holiday or weekend, then the week deadline is the next business day.

Resubmission, Blocked, Deferred, or Cancelled Status

  • If none of the criteria are met even after the presentation, the Product Council will work with the Submitter to understand what is needed to continue the endorsement process.

  • The Submitter can also elect to cancel the submission.

    • The comments section of the JIRA may be used for this purpose.

    • If a meeting is required or desired, it's the responsibility of the Point of Contact to find a time that works and set the meeting up with the Product Council.

  • If the Submitter can elect to resubmit, then all issues are resolved and the Submitter requests a re-review.

    • JIRA workflow: the ticket is transitioned from REVIEW to SUBMITTED.

  • The Submitted can also elect to withdraw their submission.

    • JIRA workflow: the ticket is transitioned from REVIEW to CANCELLED.

  • The Submitted can also elect to defer their submission.

    • JIRA workflow: the ticket is transitioned from REVIEW to DEFERRED.

  • The Submitted and Product Council see that the new functionality is blocked.

    • JIRA workflow: the ticket is transitioned from REVIEW to BLOCKED.

  • Timeline: JIRA issues needs to pass to the next step within two weeks after submission. If that deadline falls on a holiday or weekend, then the week deadline is the next business day.

Process Feedback

  1. The Evaluator asks the Submitter if they have any feedback on the process.

    • PC considers that feedback as part of the next process evaluation improvement round.

Roles

  1. Submitter

    • Creates the JIRA ticket on the PCR board.

  2. Evaluator

    • Processes a PCR ticket through the JIRA workflow

    • Can be a member of the PC or a delegate appointed by the PC

    • Must not be a member of the development team seeking approval.

  3. Point of Contact

    • Communicates relevant module information through updates to the PCR Issue in JIRA, once it has been created by the submitter.

    • Includes developers, product owners and other team members.

  • No labels