Date: 11 Dec 2024
Meeting Time: 8am ET | 1pm UK | 2pm CET
Meeting URL: https://openlibraryfoundation.zoom.us/j/88673361033 - password needed: please see link
🏘️ Housekeeping Convener & notes: Martina Schildt
Next meeting: 08 Jan 2025
ERM implementers : Please add questions, requirements and ERM implementers' topics.
Product Council meeting notes
\uD83E\uDD45 Homework \uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics Development progress update
eUsage App: Future development plans
Implementers' topic: URLs in Agreements and LIcenses documents
📔 Minutes Time
Item
Presenter
Notes
10min
Development progress update
Owen Stephens
Mainly working on issues arising from Bugfest testing
Fixed as many as possible, those fixes will be part of Ramsons
All Agreements and Licenses test cases are done
Major issue in Licenses module: uploading documents does not work; issue is existing since Poppy; will be fixed for Poppy and Quesnelia as CSPs
Currently developing external Push KB service; will be tested in GBV first, but is available for everyone
15min
eUsage App - future development plans
Stefan Dombek
Stefan Dombek is Product Owner for eUsage app for 5 months now
App is now in phase where there is more management needed than new development done
Stefan can always be contacted directly via Slack
Some additional requirements are already identified for further discussion
Stefan presents plans for 2025
COUNTER 5.1 Support
Improving the integration of aggregators
Improvement of error handling
Obtain feedback from the community and check and, if necessary, implement further requirements
eUsage is already in use by some institutions internationallly; others are testing it
Question: Are you also going to work on the eUsage plugin that connects Agreements and eUsage? > this will be discussed next year
35min
URLs in Agreements and LIcenses documents
Owen Stephens
With the Q release, the validation of URL fields in Agreements and Licenses has changed. The URLs to wikis and Jiras, which only resolve internally, are no longer validated. Same happens to file paths. As a result, libraries can no longer save the records where they have entered respective information in the URL field.
Wish: add another field for URLs that don’t fit the validation criteria.
Alternative: allow flexibility in validation
✍️ Chat
Action items
⤴ Decisions