\uD83D\uDDD3 Meeting information
Date:
Meeting Time: 8am ET | 1pm UK | 2pm CET
Meeting URL: https://openlibraryfoundation.zoom.us/j/88673361033 - password needed: please see link
🏘️ Housekeeping
Convener & notes: Martina Schildt
Next meeting:
ERM implementers: Please add questions, requirements and ERM implementers' topics.
Product Council meeting notes
\uD83E\uDD45 Homework
\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics
Development progress update
eUsage App: Future development plans
Implementers' topic: URLs in Agreements and LIcenses documents
📔 Minutes
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
10min | Development progress update | ||
15min | eUsage App - future development plans | ||
35min | URLs in Agreements and LIcenses documents | With the Q release, the validation of URL fields in Agreements and Licenses has changed. The URLs to wikis and Jiras, which only resolve internally, are no longer validated. Same happens to file paths. As a result, libraries can no longer save the records where they have entered respective information in the URL field. Wish: add another field for URLs that don’t fit the validation criteria. Alternative: allow flexibility in validation Example values from ZBW that we’re storing in our agreements and licenses. We’re not neccessarily keen to add all of those data into the URL field. With Quesnelia, the only appropriate field is labled “Physical description” what seems a bit odd. Maybe this field could be renamed to support all kinds of “non urls”.
|