\uD83D\uDDD3 Date
\uD83D\uDC65 Participants
\uD83E\uDD45 Goals
Compare notes on how we load users
Discuss Feature prioritization
\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
5 min | Note taker | ||
25 min | Practices for loading users | 5C uses automated scripts each night. Each of the 5 members sends their own file to the central server; gets processed by daily load script. [Note, UMass does incremental loads, have a script which identifies new / changed records. Full loads ideally done once per year, in practice somewhat more often. The other 4 institutions do full loads each night.] Current script used is based on old EBSCO script, but work is being done to replace this with a simpler & easier to maintain script. Michigan State gets a nightly feed from central University. Library IT works with Campus IT. Community borrowers are added manually. Community borrowers use the user barcode for External system ID – this ensures that community borrower accounts do not get over-written by the nightly feed. As needed, records are manually deleted. U Chicago gets a feed from Campus IT. A scheduled process using direct SQL (bypassing mod-user-import, which has been found problematic) gets the feed into the database. records are kept forever, as people sometimes come back (student graduates, then comes back as staff member, etc.). | |
30 min | Feature prioritization | Questions for discussion (cribbed from Product Council 11-07 meeting notes):
Ans: Amelia has created a Gap list, similar to the one the RA SIG has. Can use it for prioritization. Discuss regularly in meetings, decide which features are most important.
Gap list on Users SIG page.
|