Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2017-09-08 RM Meeting notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Next »

Date

Attendees

 

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
 Minute-taker?Peter McCracken
  • Kristin Martin noted ER&L proposals are due end of next week. Eric Hartnett and Kristin M working on workflows presentation; Peter McCracken working on another proposal regarding the different way in which FOLIO is being created, with particular regard to marketplace.
45 min
  1. Entity-Relationship diagram (quick overview – 5 mins)
  2. A couple data flow diagrams (quick overview – 10-15 mins)
    1. Create vendor data flow (simple)
    2. Create PO line data flow (more complicated)
  3. Vendor record UI (25-30 mins)
    1. Start to review/collect feedback; will need to continue at the next call

The vendor record prototype will be posted to Discuss.

Stacks and Acquisitions subgroup
  • Former user (Deleted) introduced himself; described work that Stacks is tasked with working on acq module.
  • Overview of developers: Former user (Deleted) is a dedicated FOLIO developer. Dennis Bridges took over some work that Leah Elzinga had been doing. They are updating ERDs, data flow diagrams, data dictionary. Dennis introduced himself; he is product owner for this. He is Chief Product Officer at Stacks, Inc.
  • Ann-Marie Breaux (Deactivated) clarified that she, Anne Cambell, Hkaplanian, John Ballestro, Steve Sellick (UC Boulder) working with the three developers from Stacks to work through these in a small setting. About 50 people will be gathering in Montreal in about 2 weeks to go over a lot of this at a Developers Meeting.
  • JD showed current entity-relationship diagram (ERD); current structure is close to done. He described a lot of the parts of the model, with vendor information, particularly connected to consortia, plus EDI information (this may need some additional work following discussion yesterday).
  • K Martin pointed out that some vendors will have multiple interfaces; may need to change relationship type from one-to-one to one-to-many. They will discuss and investigate in the next week or two. But with discussion, we determined this is actually the ordering platform, not the access platform as Kristin had initially thought. Virginia Martin raised questions about the many different platforms that larger vendors will have - so much acquired from a publisher who is also an access provider and also a vendor; but also other content acquired via subsc agents from the same publisher/access provider. ERM tools and issues have not yet been addressed in this model.
  • JD showed simple data flow diagram, designed to delineate various parts of data structure. Example: creating a vendor. Render phase (refers to UI) - what are messages to view UI form? Action phase (complete the form). Resolution phase - end result; what are changes to database, for example? He then showed various structures for how a Purchase Order line would be created, with various different paths to completing the creation of an order. Much discussion ensued, all recorded.
  • To ensure time was available for the next part of the meeting, further discussion will be transferreed to Discuss. Discuss post location: _________. (to be added)
45 min

Austin (Frontside) Development Team

  • We are building the eHoldings app that connects to the EBSCO KB API. The eHoldings app will allows librarians to search KB, add/remove packages/titles to/from holdings, and manage coverage dates, etc.
  • Provide demo and feedback of work done to date (also to be moved to Discuss?)

Khalilah Gambrell, Product Owner for the Austin Development Team

 

Action items

  •  
  • No labels