Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

DR-000025 - Deletion of core-module records may leave dangling references from non-core modules

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Submitted Date

  

Approved Date

 

Status

SUPERSEDED by ADR-xxx

ImpactMEDIUM

 

Overrides/Supersedes 

This decision was migrated from the Tech Leads Decision Log as part of a consolidation process.  The original decision record can be found here.

This decision is now superseded by Data consistency and message driven approach.

RFC 

N/A

Stakeholders

  • Front-end and back-end devs of non-core modules that hold references to records in core-modules

Contributors

Zak Burke 

Approvers

This decision was made by the Tech Leads group prior to the adoption of current decision making processes within the FOLIO project.

Background/Context

  • Deletion of records by core UI modules is problematic because it may leave dangling references to deleted records in non-core modules. Core modules are at the bottom of the hierarchy, unaware of the modules that sit above them in the hierarchy; this prevents core modules from issuing queries to identify such references. This is succinctly, if frustratingly, captured in the PR discussion related to UITEN-128.
  • Even if we can resolve this in the UI (see notes, below) the possibility remains that direct API requests to delete records may leave dangling references in other parts of the system.

Assumptions

N/A

Constraints

N/A

Rationale

N/A

Decision

Yikes

Implications

  • Pros
    • N/A
  • Cons
    • N/A

Other Related Resources

  • No labels