Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 4
Next »
Date
Attendees
Goals
- understand status of and thinking surrounding user management
- identify consortial implications and share with UM SIG
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
45mins | User Management discussion with Chris Manly | All | UM SIG overview - single db of users
- patrons and staff all in one
- permissions designate ability to perform staff functions
- user metadata identified
Current points of discussion - SSO
- focuse on Shibboleth integration
- likely to be a need for first implementers
- also ability to have local user authentication
- what happens to SSO users with no privileges (and stumble on FOLIO)
- bulk user import
- focusing on transactional API to create/modify user in one step
- assumption that sources of users will vary greatly
- what happens when record comes in from feed on record that has been manually edited?
- under discussion; protected fields
- JSON as data format
Consortial considerations - metadata field requirements
- what fields are repeatable?
- addresses and notes
- for consortia, patrons need to belong to multiple patron groups
- single patron record with multiple barcodes use case; this isn't accounted for in FOLIO currently
- are we working with a one library per tenant model?
- tenant awareness to define consortial relationships
- need to not put the responsibility on the user to choose
- how do you map users from one tenant to another? "consortia broker module" to handle mapping
- this model might make it easier to represent multiple consortial relationships
- observed increase in informal consortial relationships/partnerships
- makes it easier to sever relationships too
- bulk import
- handle multiple feed sources
- documentation of required format for FOLIO
- possible area of app development ("the MarcEdit of user records")
- super user - needs to be able to transcend tenants
- other staff might need to transcend tenants too
- tenant/library relationship seems like a pretty fundamental thing to figure out
|
10mins | Resource access requirements preview for next meeting | All | David Dahl will work on scheduling someone from RA (probably Andrea) to join next week or the week following. |
5mins | New meeting time progress | David | Looking like Wednesdays 9-10am Eastern is going to be the new meeting time. Waiting on a couple more responses. |
Action items
- All - review Resource Access requirements for discussion at next meeting
- David Dahl - schedule RA representation for upcoming meeting