Texas A&M - reduced "go live" rankings by 60%, other 4 have also reduced - total "outliers" reduced by 10%
How to go forward? Everything we need done is a request for more resources, where can those resources come from?
One library noted that even those the rankings may be lowered, these are still things we have to do
Texas A&M - acknowledged that productivity in FOLIO will suffer the first year or two, too many workarounds and manual processes, some important local projects may have to be sidelined for a year or two
Duke - see too many workarounds, they really need these features - brings up the question, what is a functioning LSP? - Workflows are incomplete, different from what they have now, too short-staffed now, have a hiring freeze, libraries can't do more with less any more
The other four libraries really have to go next year, can Duke wait?
Performance, response times, and upgrades in place are still critical for all and not there
Chicago is offering to share their OCLC update program, people brought up other examples of things to share
**Wed June 10 update**
Holly extended the "Outlier" deadline to noon Monday June 15, please make comments on the firm "go-live" decisions