Anything tagged in Jira as MVP or one of the rounds should be in the sheet for the POs so they know what's critical for one of the rounds.
Need to match the requirements to the UXPROD, split the UXPROD, or create new UXPROD issues.
Important that performance be added as a requirement. Libraries should be able to load XXX records in YYY time (it's on there).
There's still a discrepancy between institutions in the rounds. Given capacity, it may not be realistic to address all those requirements. maybe focus on developing just for next library likely to implement. Holly had the impression that the Rounds were trumping the gap analysis. Round IV in addition to MVP, who is the library the closest to MVP, but a little beyond it. Holly's not looking at what XXX institution needs to go live (as listed in the Jiras?), but just at the MVP and the Round IV list.
Holly: We still need to go through the Round IV and who goes next. We're not going to get everything developed, feels like some member institutions SIGs have a realistic view of what their institutions need in a specific area. To really come up with a list of what really needs to be done beyond MVP.
Really, what we need is a common denominator, what everyone needs. If there's an outlying issue, that may be put off? Gets tricky. Good to know which features are those needed by everyone vs. specific libraries. Would be really good to document in a spreadsheet form what's needed who absolutely needs something on day one.
MVP will not be done for Q2. We have one library that will in implement in Round II. Implementing in late December.