Date
Recordings
Find all recordings including captions and Chat here: https://recordings.openlibraryfoundation.org/folio/resource-access-sig/ (pw: folio-lsp)
Zoom
https://zoom.us/j/337279319 (pw: folio-lsp)
Attendees
Discussion Items:
Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals/Info/notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
20 min | Administrivia | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hr7Vx-swyCGfQ3571AK8nYx2MMWb1VFoaqrCYOPE8mM/edit#gid=1954860094 | Note taker: Jana Freytag | |
20 Min | Permissions - Bug reported to the Support SIG | Sharon Wiles-Young | Permission should allow for renewal of Aged to Lost items, but generates error message | Julie will be updating this bug. |
20 Min | Bulk edit | Magda Zacharska | UXPROD-3806 |
|
Coming out of WOLFCons cross consil meetings
These are Questions asked by PC. (please everyone in RA SIG feel free to edit and add to this)
Questions | Answer RA SIG | LMU (Julie, Product Owner) | institution XX | institution XX | institution XX | institution XX | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Can you share the purpose of your SIG: functional area/cross cutting/affinity group, etc? | The Resource Access SIG works with developers to define essential circulation functions: checking out and discharging library materials. Defines patron types, loan types, fines and fees structures, recalls, holds. Defines essential reporting functions. Advises developers on the interactions needed between libraries and other parties necessary for successful sharing of resources, whether through shared consortial collections, interlibrary loan options, or other mechanisms. Ths RA SIG works closely with the UM SIG, with members being present in both SIGs | ||||||
What areas does your SIG have responsibility for? | all circulation components:
| ||||||
A: What do you feel like your SIGs purpose is currently? B: Has it changed over time? | A: our purpose hasn't change (support development relating to our area) but can't fullfil it because of the lack of POs and dev ressources B: more focused on libraries that are live - more problem solving than developement of new features direct feedback to POs working on the backlog we are doing the work we can rather than the work we should do | SIGs originally used to be to collect requirements (I think); now, because our backlog is already so large, any requirements collected now will take a long time to see the light of day. So the SIG has also become a place to disucss workarounds, solve problems, share best practices. I don't see this as a bad thing, rather as the natural evolution of an audiance who now also needs help implementing. | |||||
A: Do you have product owners who regularly work with the SIG? B: Do you feel that your requirements are being successfully developed into FOLIO? | A: Yes B: Sort of: No: 3-Part Item status, Workflow engine, Courses, German Reminder fees | ||||||
How do you feel about the resources allocated in the development areas that are focused on? | |||||||
A: What are some of the challenges facing your SIG/subgroup? B: Are there ways in which you feel the SIG has been unable to accomplish it's mission? | A: Missing POs B: | ||||||
A: What has been successful with the SIG? B: What things contributed to that success? | A: B: | ||||||
What could the Product Council do to help the SIG? | |||||||
Do you feel like the Roadmap accurately represents the work of your SIG (both desired and already accounted for)? | |||||||
A: How can we improve our communications with the SIG? B: Does the current monthly reporting work? C: Would have a dedicated PC meeting for your SIG be helpful? | A: B: C: | ||||||
A: What functions should the PC be accomplishing? B: And how would the SIGs like to have those need met? | A: B: | I don't think there is more the PC can do really, until there are more POs to make the backlog dev-ready, and more devs to program that backlog. | |||||
For groups that are on hiatus, can you talk a little about why and whether you think there are current activites that should be done? | All subgroups on hiatus please leave a comment: |