You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version .
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 2
Next »
Date 13 Jun 2019
Attendees Cate Boerema (Deactivated)
Discussion Items Time Item Who Description Goals 30+ min Requests rankings Review relative rankings for Requests from gap analysis Review the requests UXPROD rankings according to Holly's proposed process: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PxQ-qPJeCLkUEaOhZL4bQHUA3vT80e1tivfZsjCr1WY/edit Goal is to:Make sure ppl understand the meaning of the features (use cases will be really valuable here) Discuss any surprises ("why was this ranked so high/low")? Really question whether each feature is going to be a blocker for go-live with the goal or reducing go-live rankings for institutions Split features if one piece seems higher priority than another SIG members should be empowered to update their rankings on the fly during the discussion (spreadsheet will be provided) 15min Anonymization Manual anonymization of loans & fines/fees Decide: is a setting needed to prevent (or allow) manual anonymization of loans with fines/fees 10min Check out Check out messages order Tradeoff at checkout: suboptimal message order (non-circulating override displays at the end) with better performance, OR optimal message order with slower performance?
Meeting Outcomes Functional Area
Product Owner
Planned Release (if known) Decision Reached
Comments
e.g. loans, fees/fines Name e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019
Notes