Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2024-5-22 Data Import Subgroup meeting

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Recordings are posted Here (2022+) and Here (pre-2022)                   Slack channel for Q&A, discussion between meetings

Requirements details Here                                                                    Additional discussion topics in Subgroup parking lot


Attendees: 

Notetaker: Corrie Hutchinson

Links:

Agenda: 

TopicWhoMeeting NotesRelated JiraDecisions and Actions

Announcements:





Discuss: Issue of multiple SRS with State "ACTUAL" after Update jobCorrie HutchinsonChristie ThomasSee Slack discussion here: https://folio-project.slack.com/archives/CA39M62BZ/p1716239777567769

Review/Discuss: UXPROD-4303: Set instance/bib record for deletion

Review and discuss feedback from initial testing of new 'Set record for deletion' action for Instances.

What is the expectation of being able to update a record that has been set to delete? In testing, it is possible to update an instance record that has been marked for deletion.


See notes from DI Lab sessions here and spreadsheet 


Previous discussion notes:

 Click here to expand...
  • Ryan has reviewed the spreadsheet of feedback and shared some already with the dev team.  
  • MODSOURCE-756 : newly submitted ticket 
    • Folijet is reviewing the ticket and options for addressing it
    • Hoping to address with a simple BE update
  • In some instances, neither 'suppress' or 'delete' covers all needs.  
  • Advocation for a separate section in the 'Actions' button for the deletion actions.
  • Lots of open questions concerning dependencies (outlined on the spreadsheet).  Important for future phases of this project (not part of Phase 1).
    • Note : ensure that item status is accounted for in reviewing dependencies ; i.e. items on loan 
  • Should the default behavior be that the user is expected to delete holdings and items before the instance? i.e. dependencies aren't as important
    • Use case could be that holdings and items are marked for deletion separately; last step is to mark instance for deletion and clean all of them out at that point
    • Discussion on various internal procedures for withdrawing and deleting records
    • Practices in place in FOLIO to address the current inability to delete records leads some libraries to prefer the idea of deleting instances, holdings, and items in one step.
    • Practices can vary between libraries based on type of material: physical vs. electronic
  • No consensus on when to use a 'hard' vs. 'soft' delete.
  • Discussion on ability and need to delete the SRS & Instance separately. 
UXPROD-4303 - Getting issue details... STATUS
















Notes from previous meetings...





Upcoming meetings/agenda topics:


Chat: 


  • No labels