filename prefix - all RFCs currently use 0000- defeating the purpose
conflicting process documentation between the wiki and github...
renaming can be done by RFC submitters, leave comments on the RFCs that still need it
Jenn will take on the documentation clean up
5-10 min
Officially Supported Technologies - Upkeep
All
Craig McNally successfully locked down the pages so that only TC members can edit
Craig McNally will roll out the headers to the remaining pages
Review the page status enumeration from the perspective of how/when/which modules are affected
Lock down is done, headers are there and now labels are added so things are appearing as they should be! Good progress.
Does "accepting" imply once and done or can things circle back through the statuses? How do we expect the statuses to drive what we are going to do? What process ties the statuses together?
It would be helpful to have a workflow diagram (like what JIRA has) about how the statuses transition from one to another. Need something written down.
As far as new modules, trying to show only the active one applies to a module being released right now
Some process is needed because of impact on scope. Impact can be at product level because of scope but the knowledge is at the dev level.
RFC too heavyweight for these decisions
Due diligence/communication to not surprise people
Who needs to be told? PO meeting and they communicate back
Bring to a monday meeting
ADRs might be a good solution
Should move Poppy to active, need to get Quesnelia up soon
will be used to discuss the security concerns around consortia / cross-tenant support, relaxing the tenant check
topic TBD
is holiday for several members - probably won't meet
Topic Backlog
*reminder*
Terminology Document
All
Craig McNally the term "platform" is something that we wanted to revisit but the terminology document otherwise has been accepted by the three councils
Jenn Colt has been talking with Marc Johnson on Slack and was thinking that could be part of a larger conversation about architecture
Marc Johnson is okay leading this conversation and rolling it into the Architecture discussion, we could use platform as the first topic on the Architecture sub-group